South Korea Debates 'Innovation Profit' Amid Semiconductor Boom

South Korea is grappling with the issue of distributing the substantial profits generated by its semiconductor industry. The debate intensified following remarks by Labor Minister Kim Young-ju, who reiterated the need for profit redistribution through social dialogue. As a potential solution, he suggested adjusting supply prices for partner companies.

Samsung Electronics has launched a "win-win" campaign, offering consumers 20% of their purchase price back in gift certificates for its products, totaling approximately 400 billion won. This initiative, part of a labor-management agreement, follows demands from the Samsung Electronics union for a share of the company's projected hundreds of trillions of won in operating profit. The discussion around the social distribution of semiconductor "excess profits" has gained momentum, with various stakeholders advocating for "fair distribution" to shareholders, partner firms, and society.

“

There is a need for redistribution of excess profits through social discussion.

The term "excess profit" first emerged in South Korea in 2011, proposed by former Prime Minister Chung Un-chan as an "excess profit sharing system." This model, historically originating in the 1920s Hollywood film industry and later adopted by automakers and tech giants like Google and Apple, aims to share performance gains when companies exceed profit targets with their partners. However, the term "excess profit" can carry a negative connotation, implying profits beyond a "legitimate" level and fostering a sense of entitlement for redistribution.

“

The profits earned by semiconductor companies are the price of innovation in fierce global competition.

The article argues that terms like "innovation profit" could better capture the essence of these earnings. The development of high-bandwidth memory (HBM) for AI by SK하이닉스, which significantly boosted profits, was not a matter of luck but the result of over a decade of persistent effort, overcoming numerous setbacks since SK's acquisition of the struggling company in 2012. Similarly, Samsung Electronics' dramatic performance rebound, which began in 2025, was built upon decades of maintaining its position as the world's leading memory chip producer. The immense profits earned by semiconductor giants are the reward for innovation amidst fierce global competition.

"Innovation profit" should be prioritized for reinvestment in the very innovation that drives these earnings. This aligns with President Lee Jae-myung's call to use "excess tax revenue" from semiconductors to discover new growth engines. While distributing profits to various stakeholders has merit, sustained innovation is crucial, as the current semiconductor boom may not last indefinitely. Reinvesting in R&D, facility upgrades, and supporting the innovation ecosystem, including suppliers and workers, is essential. Government support through financial and tax incentives, along with infrastructure like power and water, also plays a vital role. Returning a portion of these profits to the community is not mere charity but a necessary investment for future innovation. The article suggests that even demands for price adjustments for partner companies or social solidarity wage policies can be evaluated within the framework of fostering innovation.

“

Excess profits should be prioritized for investment in the innovation that creates them.