South Korean education election marred by accusations of partisan politics
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Candidates in the Chungbuk provincial education superintendent election are accusing each other of violating election laws and engaging in partisan politics.
- One candidate's campaign filed a complaint accusing another of violating the Local Education Autonomy Act by repeatedly posting partisan political materials.
- Accusations also involve past 'conservative unification' claims and alleged distortion of facts regarding election alliances.
The election for the Chungbuk provincial education superintendent has devolved into a mudslinging match, with candidates accusing each other of violating election laws and engaging in inappropriate partisan political behavior. Three candidates, each claiming to represent different educational philosophies such as 'democratic,' 'progressive,' and 'practical,' are trading barbs.
The election committee for candidate Yoon Geon-young filed a complaint with the Cheongju Sangdang Police Station against candidate Kim Sung-keun, alleging violations of the Local Education Autonomy Act. Yoon's camp claims Kim has repeatedly posted photos and news articles featuring himself with politicians from a specific party, despite the election not being party-affiliated. They also point to Kim's use of a slogan associated with a particular political party on a placard as evidence of partisan conduct that undermines the political neutrality and independence of education.
This complaint is a counter-move to an earlier accusation by Kim's campaign on May 29. Kim's side had urged Yoon to resign, alleging that Yoon's policy alliance with Jung Young-chul, a candidate for Yeongdong County governor from the People Power Party, violated the principle of educational political neutrality. The Local Education Autonomy Act stipulates that candidates must not endorse or oppose specific political parties, nor claim endorsement from them.
Furthermore, the election is seeing a resurgence of 'progressive vs. conservative' rhetoric. Kim's campaign accused Yoon of making false statements during a broadcast debate on May 28, specifically regarding a past 'conservative unification' effort. Kim's camp presented evidence, including campaign materials and news articles from the 2022 election, showing Yoon had previously referred to himself as a "unified conservative candidate" and stated that "conservative candidates became one." Yoon's campaign, however, denies this, claiming the term was used by the media and not by Yoon himself.
Kim's campaign criticized Yoon for benefiting from conservative sentiment when convenient but denying it now, calling it a deception of the voters. In response, Yoon's side accused Kim of dragging the election into the mud with issues from four years ago, stating that the campaign lacks policy focus and relies solely on political attacks and ideological rhetoric. Candidate Kim Jin-kyun, who previously unified with Yoon in 2022, is now running under a 'democratic practical' banner and has adopted a vintage school uniform for his campaign, emphasizing that "education is not politics."
Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.