South Korean minister reviews 'Yellow Envelope Law' scope amid legislative concerns

South Korea's Minister of Employment and Labor, Kim Young-joo, announced that the ministry is comprehensively reviewing methods to define the scope of labor disputes, as stipulated by the controversial "Yellow Envelope Law." This law, specifically articles 2 and 3 of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Act, has been a focal point of contention between labor and management.

“

We are comprehensively reviewing what methods are available, such as decrees or enforcement rules.

The review is being conducted in response to President Yoon Suk-yeol's recent directive at a cabinet meeting, urging more concrete institutionalization beyond simple administrative guidelines. Minister Kim indicated that the ministry is preparing to move forward with defining these standards through decrees or enforcement rules, acknowledging the president's call for greater specificity.

However, the approach faces criticism. Opposition lawmakers, including Na Kyung-won of the People Power Party, have questioned the necessity of the ministry's review, suggesting that the President's repeated emphasis was required before the ministry would even consider it. Concerns have also been voiced about the potential for the Ministry of Employment and Labor to exceed its legal mandate by establishing core standards through subordinate legislation, rather than amending the law itself.

“

I think Minister Kim is quite assertive. It seems the minister only decided to review it after the president mentioned it twice.

Critics argue that defining the scope of labor disputes and user recognition through enforcement decrees could be seen as an overreach. They contend that such measures do not address the fundamental issues and that the ambiguity surrounding these aspects requires a legislative revision of the "Yellow Envelope Law" itself, rather than relying on lower-level regulations to clarify the terms.

“

This is a matter that requires revision of the "Yellow Envelope Law" itself, not subordinate legislation.