Spanish judge calls for tougher physical barriers at Ceuta and Melilla borders

Spanish judge Jesús Villegas has urged for enhanced border security measures in the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla, asserting that current Spanish law provides the framework for more robust physical barriers to deter irregular migration attempts. Villegas contends that the failure to implement such deterrents is a deliberate political choice for which authorities are accountable.

“

The Spanish law allows authorities to establish more effective physical barriers to prevent irregular crossing attempts, and that not resorting to these measures remains a political decision for which the authorities bear responsibility.

Speaking on the television program "Espejo Público," Villegas addressed the ongoing debate in Spain following mass border crossing attempts into Ceuta. He emphasized that irregular migration does not grant individuals the right to cross borders or enter Spanish territory outside legal channels, characterizing such actions as violations of Spanish law. The judge clarified that a Supreme Court ruling on the immediate return of irregular migrants does not preclude authorities from strengthening border protection.

Villegas highlighted that the law permits the installation of containment barriers and systems on land and at sea if deemed necessary by authorities. He noted that his visits to Melilla and conversations with police and civil guard personnel revealed the existence of technical solutions, including more formidable barriers and walls, that could significantly impede border crossings. According to his sources, the non-implementation of these solutions stems from political considerations related to Spain's international image.

“

Irregular migration does not grant the right to cross borders or enter Spanish territory through the border fence or sea routes outside legal channels, and those who do so violate Spanish law.

The judge criticized the effectiveness of the current border protection system, pointing out that existing barriers do not prevent repeated attempts at intrusion. This, he argued, exposes law enforcement and military personnel to increased risks during collective crossing attempts. Villegas concluded by reiterating that the law allows for more effective containment measures and called for the necessary investments, placing the ultimate decision-making power and responsibility with the political authorities.

“

The Supreme Court ruling does not prevent authorities from strengthening border protection, but rather allows for the establishment of barriers and containment systems on land and at sea.