DistantNews
Support us
Strasbourg court orders Serbia to compensate COVID-19 protester over unfair trial
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia /Crime & Justice

Strasbourg court orders Serbia to compensate COVID-19 protester over unfair trial

From N1 Serbia · () Serbian

Translated from Serbian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Official statement Outcome reported
  • The European Court of Human Rights ruled Serbia must pay 3,600 euros to a COVID-19 protester convicted in an unfair trial.
  • The court found Serbia violated the right to a fair trial and the right to examine witnesses in the case of a protester convicted of insulting police.
  • Serbia failed to properly consider or provide reasons for refusing to hear an eyewitness or examine video footage relevant to the case.

The European Court of Human Rights has ordered Serbia to pay 3,600 euros in damages to a participant in Belgrade's anti-COVID protests. The ruling stems from an unfair trial in 2020, where the individual was convicted of insulting police.

Serbia must pay 3,600 euros in non-pecuniary damages to a participant in Belgradeโ€™s anti-COVID protests who was convicted in 2020 in an unfair proceeding

โ€” European Court of Human RightsAnnouncing the judgment in the case of Iskrenovic v. Serbia.

The court found that Serbia violated Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, specifically concerning the right to a fair trial and the right to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses. The case centered on the conviction of Mr. Iskrenovic, which hinged on the credibility of the arresting police officer's account.

Mr Iskrenovicโ€™s request that the Serbian courts hear an eyewitness and obtain video footage from surveillance cameras had therefore been neither unreasonable nor vexatious.

โ€” European Court of Human RightsExplaining the court's finding on the failure to consider requested evidence.

Crucially, the ECHR determined that the Serbian courts failed to adequately consider the relevance of evidence requested by Iskrenovic. This included hearing an eyewitness and obtaining surveillance footage, which could have clarified whether the alleged insult occurred or if the officers initiated the encounter. The national courts' refusal to examine this evidence, without sufficient justification, undermined the overall fairness of the proceedings and prevented the defense from effectively challenging the prosecution's case.

The national courts had, however, failed to properly consider the relevance of such evidence and had not provided sufficient reasons for refusing to obtain and examine it

โ€” European Court of Human RightsDetailing the specific violation of fair trial rights.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by N1 Serbia in Serbian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.