DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Crime & Justice

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Drug Charges Against Student, Doctor Over Illegal Prosecution Probe

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Official statement Outcome reported
  • The Supreme Court upheld a lower court's decision to dismiss charges against a university student and a doctor accused of drug offenses.
  • The court ruled that the prosecution's direct investigation into the drug case was illegal, as it lacked direct relevance to the initial police-submitted case.
  • This ruling stems from a broader investigation into drug use within a large university club, where the main suspect, the club president, had already received a prison sentence.

South Korea's Supreme Court has finalized the dismissal of charges against a university student and a doctor implicated in drug offenses. The ruling confirms the appellate court's decision, which found the prosecution's direct investigation into the case to be unlawful. The core issue revolved around the prosecution's assertion that the drug case, initially handled by the police, was directly related to other crimes they were investigating.

The student and the doctor were accused of purchasing and using methamphetamine, allegedly obtained from the president of a university-affiliated club. This club reportedly involved hundreds of students from 13 universities in the Seoul metropolitan area. The club president, who was central to the initial investigation, had his sentence of one year and six months imprisonment finalized by the Supreme Court in June.

While the first trial resulted in suspended sentences for both the student and the doctor, the appellate court overturned these convictions, issuing a dismissal of the charges. This dismissal was based on the finding that the prosecution's investigation violated procedural laws. The prosecution had argued that their direct investigation was permissible under the Prosecutors' Office Act, which allows for direct investigation into cases with "direct relevance" to those initially submitted by the police.

However, the appellate court determined that the student and doctor were not identified as co-conspirators when the police submitted the club president's case. The prosecution's investigation into them was initiated based on information found in a confession from another co-conspirator. The court concluded that this was not a natural progression of the initial investigation but rather a separate inquiry based on new evidence, thus lacking the required "direct relevance" to the police-submitted case. The Supreme Court concurred with this reasoning, rejecting the prosecution's appeal.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.