T-MEC: Mexico's Trade Successes and Missed Opportunities Over 32 Years
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Mexico has significantly boosted its manufacturing exports and become the U.S.'s top supplier over 32 years of trade agreements, transforming from a commodity-based economy.
- Despite these gains, the country failed to fully capitalize on market access due to a lack of competitive national suppliers and a cohesive industrial policy.
- Infrastructure limitations, particularly in energy and water, and regulatory uncertainty have also hampered the benefits of nearshoring, disproportionately affecting small and medium-sized enterprises.
Over 32 years, Mexico's trade relationship with the United States and Canada, evolving from NAFTA to the T-MEC, has demonstrably enhanced its export capabilities and manufacturing participation in the North American region. The country has successfully displaced China as the primary supplier to the U.S., fostering a more complementary productive relationship.
Mexico has confirmed its export capacity even in the face of tariffs and other restrictions.
This transformation has shifted Mexico from an economy reliant on commodities and single exports to a robust manufacturing base with solid growth foundations across multiple industries. The benefits of this integration are evident, particularly for sectors like automotive manufacturing, auto parts suppliers, logistics operators, and large manufacturers in the northern and central regions, which have attracted significant nearshoring investment.
The country transformed from an economy based on commodities and mono-exporting to a manufacturing economy, with solid bases for growth and development in multiple industries.
However, the article argues that Mexico has not optimally leveraged its advantages. A critical deficiency has been the absence of a comprehensive industrial policy to develop competitive national suppliers and integrate production chains effectively. This oversight has prevented small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from fully participating in regional value chains, widening the gap between beneficiaries and laggards.
The problem is not the possible termination of the treaty, but the challenge of operating under a different commercial relationship, whose strong cards are not proximity, the maquiladora model, and treatment under the WTO.
Furthermore, infrastructure has emerged as a significant bottleneck. The article points out that energy, water, and industrial space capacity in northern Mexico have reached saturation, limiting the scope of productive relocation. This physical constraint, coupled with regulatory and institutional uncertainty, has hindered the full realization of nearshoring's potential. The U.S. perspective also notes growing concerns in Washington regarding trade deficits and the origin of certain inputs, framing it as an economic security issue rather than purely a free trade matter.
Infrastructure became another bottleneck that the nearshoring discourse preferred to ignore.
Originally published by El Universal in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.