Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an's AI Stance Criticized as Contradictory

Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an's recent remarks dismissing the necessity of an AI-driven municipal database, as proposed by potential rival legislator Shen Po-yang, have sparked considerable debate. Chiang emphasized a focus on 'long-term care and practice' for the city's vision, a statement that political commentator Chou Hsuan has sharply criticized as contradictory. Chou points to Chiang's own ambitious pronouncements from late 2025, where he envisioned Taipei becoming a global top-ten AI city by 2035, even anticipating the next 'Open AI-level' transformation originating from the capital. The core of Chou's argument is that such aspirations are fundamentally incompatible with a rejection of data-centric approaches. 'How can AI be implemented in Taipei, and how can Taipei become a top global AI city without data and a database?' Chou questioned, highlighting the apparent disconnect in the mayor's position. From a local perspective in Taipei, the push towards technological advancement, particularly in AI, is seen as a critical pathway to enhancing urban competitiveness and improving public services. The development of a comprehensive municipal database is widely considered a foundational step for leveraging AI effectively in governance, enabling more responsive policies and efficient service delivery. Mayor Chiang's stance, therefore, appears to overlook the practical requirements for achieving his own stated technological goals, leading to accusations that his leadership lacks the necessary foresight and commitment to innovation.

“

For the planning of the city's vision blueprint, it's not just about relying on data, but on long-term care and practice on this land.