Taiwan Legislators Cannot Treat Taiwan as Merely a Place to Live and Forget Their Public Duties
Translated from Chinese and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- The commentary criticizes Kuomintang legislator Hung Hsiao-ling for saying she is culturally and by blood Chinese and merely lives in Taiwan.
- It argues that lawmakers exercise Taiwanโs legislative power over laws, budgets and national security, so cultural identity cannot blur public responsibility.
- The writer links Hungโs remarks to earlier positions on Chinaโs sovereignty claims over Taiwan and penalties for military disloyalty.
A lawmaker may describe herself as Chinese by culture and ancestry, but that does not make Taiwan merely a place of residence, argues a Liberty Times forum commentary.
The piece focuses on Kuomintang legislator Hung Hsiao-ling, who said she was โa proper Chinese person in culture and bloodโ and โjust living in Taiwan.โ It accepts cultural identity as a matter of personal freedom, but says a legislator is not a temporary resident. Hung votes on laws, reviews budgets and questions officials, with each vote potentially affecting the rights and security of 23 million people.
A proper Chinese person in culture and blood
The commentary also connects Hungโs statement with her previous political positions. During questioning of Presidential Office Secretary-General Pan Men-an in 2024, Hung asked, citing the Peopleโs Republic of Chinaโs claim to sovereignty over Taiwan, โWhatโs wrong with it reclaiming Taiwan?โ On Aug. 13 this year, she argued for reducing the maximum prison term for active-duty soldiers convicted of pledging allegiance to an enemy from seven years, as proposed by the Executive Yuan, to five years. She also said less serious cases should have the option of paying a fine instead.
Just living in Taiwan
The writer says the controversy therefore extends beyond cultural identity. A personโs ancestry in Fujian or identification with Chinese culture does not automatically create doubts about public office. The concern, the commentary says, is how the same legislator uses her legislative authority on questions involving Chinaโs sovereignty claims, military loyalty and criminal penalties.
The article concludes that politicians can have multiple cultural identities, but public responsibility cannot remain ambiguous. Hungโs seat comes from the Republic of Chinaโs democratic system, and her votes directly affect its people. The writer says Taiwanโs security, citizensโ freedom and the countryโs continued existence must come first, because the consequences of her decisions fall on Taiwanโs people, not on her family tree.
Whatโs wrong with it reclaiming Taiwan?
Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.