DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan /Crime & Justice

Taiwan politician Huang Kuo-chang wins libel case against Mirror Media

From Liberty Times · () Chinese

Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Outcome reported
  • Taiwanese politician Huang Kuo-chang has won a libel lawsuit against Mirror Media, which had sued him for calling it a "trash media" outlet.
  • The court ruled that Huang's comments were protected speech, as they constituted commentary on matters of public concern.
  • Mirror Media's appeal was rejected, upholding the lower court's decision that Huang did not defame the publication.

Taiwanese politician Huang Kuo-chang has successfully defended himself against a libel lawsuit filed by Mirror Media. The publication sought NT$1 million (approximately $30,000) in damages, alleging that Huang's repeated accusations of "trash media" and "trash weekly" harmed its reputation.

Shameless Mirror Weekly, dares to splash mud but not take responsibility.

โ€” Huang Kuo-changHuang's statement on his Facebook page criticizing Mirror Media's reporting.

Huang had publicly criticized Mirror Media in late 2024, accusing the outlet of acting as a "green camp and prosecutor's office mouthpiece" and distorting facts to aid the ruling party in targeting political opponents. He specifically cited a report linking former Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je to bribery allegations in the Jinghua City project.

The court acknowledged that Mirror Media's reporting on Ko Wen-je's alleged financial improprieties and bribery had generated controversy. However, it found that Huang, as a then-legislator and party caucus convener, was responding to media inquiries and that his comments were a common reaction. The court emphasized that his statements constituted commentary on a matter of public concern and were protected by freedom of speech.

Trash media, trash weekly.

โ€” Huang Kuo-changHuang's repeated criticisms of Mirror Media during press conferences.

Mirror Media also claimed damage to its business reputation, but the court found insufficient evidence to support this. The judges noted that in the current digital age, public opinion on media outlets and commentators is diverse, and the "marketplace of ideas" allows for counterarguments. Ultimately, the court ruled that Huang's remarks did not exceed the bounds of reasonable commentary and did not constitute unlawful infringement, upholding the initial verdict.

The court found that Huang Kuo-chang's statements were commentary on matters of public concern and were protected by freedom of speech.

โ€” Court rulingExplanation of the legal basis for dismissing the libel claim.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.