Taiwan referendum numbers spark debate between election chief and KMT
Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Taiwan's Central Election Commission Chairman You Ying-lung warned that holding more than three referendums would be burdensome for the nation's democracy.
- The opposition Kuomintang (KMT) caucus responded by urging the commission to remain neutral, comparing it to a referee who blows the whistle before the game starts.
- The KMT criticized the commission's stance, recalling the 10 referendums held in 2018 and emphasizing that democracy should empower citizens to make decisions.
Taiwan's Central Election Commission Chairman You Ying-lung has cautioned against an excessive number of referendums, stating that holding more than three would place a significant strain on the nation's democratic processes. He suggested that one referendum would be ideal, two would be "a bit much," and three would be "unbearable."
this year's number of referendums is just right, two is a bit much, three is unbearable
In response, the Kuomintang (KMT) caucus, through its secretary-general Lin Pei-hsiang, urged the Central Election Commission to uphold administrative neutrality. Lin likened the commission's role to a referee, emphasizing that the whistle should not be blown before the game begins, implying a need for impartiality throughout the process.
The KMT caucus expressed disappointment with the commission's current stance, pointing to the 2018 referendum, which saw 10 proposals put to a vote following amendments to the Referendum Act. They argued that democracy thrives on empowering citizens to make decisions, not on limiting their choices.
the referee should not blow the whistle before the game starts
Lin Pei-hsiang asserted that democracy should not be feared for allowing people to decide. He questioned whether future referendums would be further restricted, suggesting a potential move towards holding only one or none at all. The KMT believes that the purpose of referendums is to return the power of decision-making on major policies to the people, rather than allowing administrative agencies to dictate the scope of public participation.
democracy is not afraid of people making decisions, but should believe that people are capable of making decisions
Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.