DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia /Elections & Politics

Tasmanian Minister Madeleine Ogilvie Resigns After Admitting to Misleading Parliament

From ABC Australia · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Outcome reported
  • Madeleine Ogilvie resigned as a minister in Tasmania after admitting to misleading parliament.
  • She had previously stated she was not involved in any Supreme Court matters, but later clarified she had initiated legal action herself.
  • Her resignation followed questions during budget estimates hearings and a statement from the Opposition Leader.

Tasmanian minister Madeleine Ogilvie has resigned from her portfolio, a move described as a refreshing dose of ministerial responsibility in an era often characterized by a lack of accountability. Ogilvie, who had faced scrutiny over her portfolios, will now move to the backbench.

No.

โ€” Madeleine OgilvieHer initial answer to a question about Supreme Court matters in parliament.

The resignation stemmed from her admission that she had initiated Supreme Court proceedings, contradicting an earlier statement to a parliamentary committee where she denied being a party to any such matters. The admission came after months of the incorrect statement remaining on the public record. While allegations of misleading parliament often trigger strong defenses, Ogilvie's case saw a less combative response from her colleagues.

Health Minister Bridget Archer offered no staunch defense of Ogilvie when questioned. The Greens indicated potential "further action," though a no-confidence motion had not been flagged. Crucially, the Leader of Opposition Business, Ella Haddad, agreed that Ogilvie had misled parliament on the day of the admission.

I would like to add to an answer I gave yesterday. I have not been the subject of legal proceedings initiated by another party. However, I reserve my right to take any action or steps I deem necessary to protect my legal rights at any time.

โ€” Madeleine OgilvieHer subsequent clarification, which omitted key details.

The situation escalated from a seemingly routine question during last year's budget estimates hearings. Greens MLC Cassy O'Connor asked if Ogilvie had been a subject or party to any Supreme Court matters in the past 18 months. Ogilvie initially responded with a simple "No." She later offered a clarification, stating she had not been the subject of legal proceedings initiated by another party but reserved her right to take necessary action to protect her legal rights. This clarification omitted the crucial detail that she herself had started court action, effectively presenting only half the truth, which the article likens to telling a lie.

Health Minister Bridget Archer did not leap to the defence of her colleague Madeleine Ogilvie when asked about the issue.

Describing the lack of defense from a fellow minister.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by ABC Australia in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.