The final Zomergasten returned to the essence of open dialogue
Translated from Dutch and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- The final Zomergasten episode brought presenter Janine Abbring and psychiatrist Jim van Os into an open discussion about mental distress and psychosis.
- Van Os described ideas formed during mental disorganization as “meaning-making that has run out of control” and argued for dialogue instead of confinement and diagnosis alone.
- The conversation connected their personal experiences with a broader criticism of Dutch mental-health care’s limited focus on genuine contact.
The final episode of Zomergasten began with a question about the best first question. Psychiatrist Jim van Os’s answer was often a short silence, a moment in which nothing had to be filled in and a person in distress could simply exist.
Presenter Janine Abbring said the evening would be about madness. Van Os preferred the word “psychosis,” or disruption in the mental space that every person must learn to navigate. Mental balance can break down, he said, and that disruption can become so powerful and coercive that it removes a person’s view of the future.
Meaning-making that has run out of control.
Van Os avoids treating depression, anxiety and addiction as entirely separate categories. In his view, they are fundamentally forms of disruption. Finding words to describe that experience to others can be vital. Abbring and Van Os repeatedly searched for shared language, drawing on experiences that made the conversation unusually personal.
Oh, interesting.
Psychosis is Van Os’s area of expertise. Abbring said her mother had experienced several psychoses, while Van Os spoke about coming close to psychosis himself and about his son, who experienced it repeatedly. Early in his career, Van Os worked in a psychiatric hospital where patients received little meaningful care and high medication doses were used mainly to maintain calm. Under the strain, he stopped sleeping. He recalled believing, as a young psychiatrist, that diluted eau-de-vie could become a medicine for all patients. A colleague listened with compassion, which helped prevent him from completely breaking down.
Van Os said his own son did break down, and that his absence as a father may have contributed. A new relationship later brought his son back into shared reality. Van Os describes the ideas formed during a disrupted state as metaphors for deep fears and desires, “meaning-making that has run out of control.” He favors open dialogue over hospitalization, confinement and diagnosis. A person in distress, he argues, most needs sincere contact, even though Dutch health care is not currently organized around it.
Yes, sorry, this all sounds very strange.
Originally published by NRC Handelsblad in Dutch. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.