DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Elections & Politics

The lie of apartheid: The 2026 Israel election is a display of the country's diversity - opinion

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Opinion Named sources Context piece
  • The article argues that the upcoming Israeli election disproves claims of apartheid in the country, highlighting the diversity of its population and political participation.
  • It contrasts Israel's situation with historical apartheid in South Africa, emphasizing that Arab citizens in Israel hold equal rights and participate in the democratic process.
  • The author contends that comparing Israel to apartheid is offensive and antisemitic, especially given the significant role Arab citizens are expected to play in determining the election outcome.

The upcoming October 27 Israeli election is presented as a powerful rebuttal to accusations of apartheid, according to this opinion piece. The author argues that the notion of Israel as an apartheid state is a false charge, particularly when compared to the institutionalized racism of South Africa's past. The piece highlights the presence and rights of Arab citizens within Israel, contrasting their situation with the oppression faced by non-whites under apartheid.

What non-whites endured in South Africa left a terrible stain on human history.

โ€” Gil HoffmanReflecting on the historical context of apartheid in South Africa.

Drawing on personal reflections from a visit to Johannesburg's Apartheid Museum, the author emphasizes the horrors of institutionalized racism and the courage of those who fought against it. The article expresses disgust at the comparison of Israel to apartheid, citing instances like New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani's remarks. It asserts that Israel, with 73.2% of its population being Jewish, operates as a democracy where Arab citizens possess rights that were unimaginable for Black South Africans during apartheid.

And I learned how offensive it is to compare South African Apartheid to any other tragedy in human history, just as the Holocaust should never be compared to anything else that ever happened anywhere else in the world.

โ€” Gil HoffmanExpressing strong disapproval of comparing Israel to apartheid.

The piece points to Arab judges like George Karra and Salim Joubran, who have presided over cases involving prominent Jewish figures, as evidence against apartheid claims. It suggests that the upcoming election will further undermine these accusations, as Arab citizens are poised to play a decisive role. While acknowledging that Israel is not perfect and the situation for people in pre-1967 territories remains complex, the author insists that the country is far from apartheid and remains democratic and non-racist.

The apartheid canard has always been one of the easiest false charges against Israel to disprove.

โ€” Gil HoffmanAsserting that the apartheid accusation against Israel is easily refutable.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.