DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Culture & Society

The Odyssey, Homer and the Geopolitics of the Present

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Analysis Named sources Context piece
  • A dispute over whether the ancient mathematician Diophantus should be called Egyptian or Greek illustrates how modern identities can distort interpretations of the ancient world.
  • The column examines similar arguments about Homer, whose identity and even historical existence remain uncertain despite competing national claims.
  • It argues that labels based on modern nation-states, language or present-day geography often carry political assumptions that do not fit ancient history.

A silent editorial dispute over one phrase in a mathematics article led to a larger question: who has the right to claim the people of antiquity? When writing about the history of equations with several variables, the columnist called Diophantus an Egyptian mathematician. The editor changed it to โ€œGreek mathematicianโ€ without discussion. The published version kept the editorโ€™s wording.

Almost nothing is known about Diophantusโ€™s ethnic identity. Assigning him a modern nationality is anachronistic, even though historians have long assumed that he worked in Alexandria, Egypt. The usual Greek label rests largely on language. His original book no longer exists, but evidence indicates that it was written in a form of Greek. That logic, the columnist says, would be like calling most mathematicians in the world today British because they publish in English.

Calling Diophantus part of a Greek mathematical tradition does not settle the issue either. The meaning of that tradition becomes harder to define under closer examination. Euclid and Archimedes are usually treated as the most distinctly Greek mathematicians, while historians generally see Diophantusโ€™s mathematics as substantially different from theirs.

Egyptian mathematician

โ€” Kim Min-hyungThe columnistโ€™s original description of Diophantus, which an editor changed to โ€œGreek mathematician.โ€

The debate resurfaced around the popular film โ€œThe Odyssey.โ€ Even before its release, the identities of its characters and of Homer, the workโ€™s attributed author, became subjects of heated discussion. Some claims in Turkey have again presented Homer as belonging to the country. Ancient writers often associated him with Smyrna, in present-day Turkey. Yet calling him Turkish is just as anachronistic as insisting confidently on a modern Greek identity. Scholars are also broadly skeptical that Homer was a single historical individual.

The Odyssey itself reached the present through a complicated transmission, and no original text survives. That leaves another question for readers to explore: where, exactly, did the work behind the popular film come from? The uncertainty is not a side issue. It shows how easily modern geopolitical categories can be projected backward onto a world that did not organize identity in the same way.

Greek mathematician

โ€” Unnamed editorThe description inserted by the editor in the published article.
About this summary

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.