The political return: How the government mishandled the land law debate

The government's handling of a land law project is sharply criticized, with the author pointing to a lack of coherent strategy and effective communication. The piece suggests that while Sturzenegger's initial project might have been sound, its passage was undermined by internal government missteps and external nationalist pressures.

President Milei's spokesperson, Adorni, is implicated for delaying the project, and the government's digital team is blamed for failing to defend the law against accusations of being "unpatriotic." The article argues that this communication failure led the government to lose a crucial cultural battle, even among its own voter base.

“

No, not at all. Foreigners who come to work in Argentina and want to buy land or want to buy apartments or buildings or do business.

A significant contradiction is highlighted: the same administration that proposed increasing the amount of land foreigners could purchase also issued a decree to "persecute" foreigners who speak negatively about Argentina. This inconsistency is labeled as a lack of "coherence."

The article also introduces Foreign Minister Pablo Quirno, who is described as someone who seeks to please Milei and appears to feel superior. Quirno's defense of the land law project is presented as inadequate, particularly his inability to grasp that limits on foreign land ownership had already been removed. The piece contrasts Argentina's situation with other countries like Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, and Paraguay, noting their different approaches to foreign land ownership and border restrictions.

“

And yes. That will produce benefits for Argentina. If not, we fall back into the topic of 'they're taking the glaciers.'