DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan /Conflict & Security

Top US military officials face lie detectors in leak hunt

From Dawn · () English

Summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News From a news agency Under investigation
  • The Pentagon has ordered polygraph tests for about 50 Joint Staff members as it investigates leaks about US munitions stockpiles, according to The New York Times and other US media reports.
  • The inquiry follows reports that the United States had rationed some munitions, especially missile interceptors, after months of fighting Iran, claims administration officials denied.
  • President Donald Trump said the United States had substantial ammunition supplies but wanted more of some sophisticated weapons.

The Pentagon has launched a polygraph dragnet targeting senior military officials in an effort to identify who leaked classified information about US munitions stockpiles, according to US press reports.

The New York Times reported late Friday that about 50 members of the Joint Staff, the Pentagonโ€™s planning and advisory body, had been required to take lie-detector tests. The tests form part of an investigation into how classified stockpile information reached journalists.

we have a lot of ammunition, different types

· Donald TrumpTrump rejected reports of broad ammunition shortages while discussing US stockpiles.

The leak hunt follows reports that the United States had begun rationing munitions, particularly missile interceptors, because of supply concerns after several months of fighting Iran. Administration officials strongly denied those reports.

President Donald Trump said, โ€œwe have a lot of ammunition, different types,โ€ while acknowledging that โ€œfor some of the more sophisticated stuff, weโ€™d certainly like to have more.โ€

for some of the more sophisticated stuff, weโ€™d certainly like to have more

· Donald TrumpTrump acknowledged that the United States wanted larger supplies of some advanced munitions.
About this summary

Originally published by Dawn. Summarized and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.