DistantNews
Support us
🇦🇺 Australia /Economy & Trade

Trading 'woke palaces' for 'basic' homes could cut costs, but drawbacks remain

From ABC Australia · () English

Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Analysis Named sources Context piece
  • Australia's Coalition wants to reduce building rules and promote more affordable, basic homes as part of its response to the housing crisis.
  • Supporters say simpler homes could help young people enter the market, while critics warn that weaker energy-efficiency and accessibility standards could deepen inequality and raise long-term costs.
  • Young Australians interviewed by ABC offered mixed views, with some prioritizing home ownership and others questioning whether more new homes alone will solve the crisis.

Australia's opposition wants to replace what it calls "woke palaces" with more basic homes, arguing that fewer building rules could speed construction and help people enter the housing market. The proposal has opened a debate over what buyers would give up for a lower price.

Get rid of red tape, get approvals through, make it easier.

· Angus TaylorThe opposition leader argued for faster approvals and fewer barriers to construction.

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor called for red tape to be removed and approvals to move faster. Housing spokesman Andrew Bragg has promoted major reductions to the National Construction Code, suggesting that some energy-efficiency and accessibility measures could become optional extras. He later softened his language after agreeing that such homes would initially be "substandard".

"They will not be substandard, they will be strong, safe, secure, and with lovely amenity," Bragg said. He compared the proposal with buying a basic first car rather than a luxury Lamborghini.

They will not be substandard, they will be strong, safe, secure, and with lovely amenity.

· Andrew BraggThe shadow housing minister defended the proposed basic homes after earlier describing them as substandard.

For Maya Sabattini, a 23-year-old marketing worker in Perth, the possibility of a more affordable home is attractive. Owning a home feels out of reach, she said, and a basic property could offer the stability that renting does not. "Most of my peers would agree that … we're just looking for somewhere to invest our money wisely," she said. She added that the home would not need to meet every standard or be flashy.

Most of my peers would agree that … we're just looking for somewhere to invest our money wisely.

· Maya SabattiniThe Perth resident explained why she would consider a more basic home if it made ownership attainable.

Sabattini acknowledged that lower energy-efficiency standards could mean higher bills, but said that would not deter her at this stage. En-mei Miao, an Australian National University student in Canberra, was more doubtful. She said many people in Generation Z faced becoming lifelong renters and warned that less accessible homes could shut out people with fewer advantages. "Increasing the supply of housing where that supply doesn't fit the needs of all Australians" could worsen existing inequalities, she said. Miao also called the phrase "woke palace" vulgar and argued that empty existing homes should form part of the wider discussion.

Increasing the supply of housing where that supply doesn't fit the needs of all Australians

· En-mei MiaoThe ANU student warned that building homes without meeting accessibility needs could worsen inequality.
About this summary

Originally published by ABC Australia in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.

More Stories

From Our Blog