Trump administration set to spend $900 million on White House construction projects - report
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Trump administration plans to spend at least $900 million on White House construction projects, including a helipad and a ballroom.
- Funds for these projects are reportedly being gathered from other agencies and private donors, bypassing direct congressional appropriation.
- A federal appeals court recently halted construction on a $400 million ballroom, citing legal challenges.
The Trump administration is reportedly set to allocate at least $900 million for extensive construction projects on the White House grounds, according to a Washington Post report citing internal records. These plans include the construction of a helipad and a significant $400 million ballroom.
Instead of seeking direct funding from Congress, the administration has allegedly gathered funds from various government agencies and private donors. These funds are being directed into an account typically used for routine White House maintenance, which holds only a few million dollars. Confidential contracts and planning documents suggest these funds will be repurposed for major "modernization projects."
These construction plans have faced significant legal hurdles. Last week, a U.S. federal appeals court ordered a halt to the construction of the $400 million ballroom, located on the site of the White House's demolished East Wing. This decision represents a setback for the administration in a case that has tested presidential authority regarding construction projects.
In response to inquiries about the Washington Post report, a White House spokesperson reiterated that renovations to the East Wing are essential for the security of the president, the White House grounds, and related security infrastructure. The spokesperson also confirmed that the president and other individuals are funding the ballroom project to the tune of approximately $400 million.
Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.