Tunisia: Debate on Irregular Immigration Needs Factual Basis and Respect for National Sovereignty

A recent statement by Tunisian associations and political parties regarding sub-Saharan migrants has drawn criticism for offering a unilateral perspective on the country's migration situation. The article argues that the statement overlooks essential context, particularly the critical distinction between migrants in regular situations and those present in Tunisia in violation of entry and stay laws.

The core issue for much of the Tunisian public, the piece explains, is irregular immigration and the associated challenges to security, social balance, public resource management, and legal compliance. The statement's denunciation of state institutions for alleged "complicity" or "banalization" is deemed excessive, especially given the ongoing efforts by Tunisian authorities. Despite economic hardships, public structures continue to provide health and social services to numerous foreign nationals, including those with precarious administrative status, underscoring Tunisia's commitment to solidarity and human dignity.

The article also addresses a widely circulated video presented as evidence of a serious aggression against a migrant family. It emphasizes that in a state of law, the truth of events must be determined by official investigations, not social media or emotional reactions to images. Any definitive claims made before the conclusion of these investigations should be treated with caution.

Furthermore, the author regrets that some civil society actors equate any criticism of irregular immigration with racism or xenophobia. This approach, the article contends, hinders a calm and democratic debate on a matter of significant public concern. Defending immigration laws, the piece concludes, is not about rejecting foreigners or denying their dignity, but about affirming a sovereign state's legitimate right to control its borders and manage its population.