Turkey's new cybersecurity law sparks fears of 'absolute digital subjugation'

Human rights organizations have sounded the alarm over a new Turkish cybersecurity law, warning it risks establishing a system of "absolute digital subjugation." The legislation grants President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's administration significantly expanded powers over internet services, gaming platforms, and social media accounts, raising concerns about freedom of expression and dissent.

According to Reporters Without Borders (RSF), approximately 90% of Turkey's national media is already under government control. Platforms like X, YouTube, and Instagram are seen as some of the few remaining spaces for critical reporting and dissenting opinions. Turkey's standing in the latest World Press Freedom Index, compiled by RSF, is alarmingly low at 163rd out of 180 countries.

“

The new measure is directly from the standard information control playbook used in authoritarian contexts. Cybersecurity powers should not be concentrated in the hands of the executive branch. They should also be subject to adequate safeguards.

Tomiwa Ilori, a senior researcher at Human Rights Watch's technology and rights division, described the new measure as "directly from the standard information control playbook used in authoritarian contexts." He emphasized that cybersecurity powers should not be concentrated within the executive branch and must include adequate safeguards.

The new law centralizes digital surveillance authority within Turkey's Directorate of Cyber Security, which reports directly to President Erdogan's office. This directorate can now issue urgent measures on its own initiative or at the request of security agencies. Telecommunications operators, internet service providers, and other online platforms are mandated to comply with these directives within two hours, with judicial review only occurring after implementation. The government justifies the law on national security grounds, framing cyberspace as vital for protecting digital sovereignty, critical infrastructure, and public order. Critics, however, view it as a tool to further consolidate control, with one law professor calling it "a command center for the regime of digital subjugation."

“

It creates a command center for the regime of digital subjugation.