Two-Thirds of Public Health Doctors Find Government's 'Circuit Practice' Solution Inadequate

The Dong-A Ilbo reports on a critical survey of public health doctors (공보의) in South Korea, revealing widespread dissatisfaction with the government's proposed 'circuit practice' solution to address the declining number of doctors. The survey, conducted by the Korean Association of Public Health Doctors (대공협), indicates that a significant majority of these doctors find the circuit practice system inadequate and prefer a redistribution of doctors to focus on underserved areas, reducing their individual workload.

“

The majority of doctors believe that circuit practice is not appropriate.

The doctors' concerns highlight a disconnect between the government's policy and the reality on the ground. The 'circuit practice' model, which requires doctors to serve multiple medical institutions, is seen as inefficient and potentially detrimental to patient care, especially in areas where private clinics are readily available. The article emphasizes that this system may actually hinder medical accessibility for vulnerable populations, contrary to its intended purpose.

“

The reason for deeming circuit practice inappropriate is that there are private medical institutions nearby.

Furthermore, the survey points to the demanding service period of 36 months for public health doctors, compared to the shorter term for regular soldiers, as a primary reason for the dwindling numbers. Many doctors expressed willingness to serve as public health doctors if the service period were reduced to 24 months. The doctors also rejected the idea of a 'vulnerable area training system,' viewing it as a way to exploit resident doctors as low-cost labor rather than a genuine solution.

“

Reducing the number of workplaces and concentrating on major hubs for work is the best alternative.

From the perspective of Dong-A Ilbo, a prominent South Korean newspaper, this issue underscores a systemic problem in healthcare resource allocation and physician welfare. The article implicitly criticizes the government's reactive approach, suggesting that a more thoughtful redistribution of resources and a reconsideration of service terms are necessary to ensure adequate medical coverage, particularly in rural and underserved regions. The voices of the doctors, as captured in the survey and quotes, are central to this narrative, framing the government's policy as out of touch with the needs of both medical professionals and the communities they serve.

“

There are quite a few elderly people who complain, 'Why isn't there a doctor in my area every day?'