DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Culture & Society

U.S. Limits Foreign Journalists' Stay to 240 Days, Sparking Retaliation Fears

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources New plan
  • The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has finalized a rule limiting foreign journalists' stay in the U.S. to 240 days.
  • This change replaces the previous system where journalists could stay as long as their credentials were valid.
  • Media organizations and press freedom advocates express concern that the rule could be used to retaliate against critical reporting and may lead to reciprocal measures against U.S. journalists abroad.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has finalized a rule that will limit the stay of foreign journalists in the country to a maximum of 240 days per entry. This significant change, set to take effect on September 15, replaces the previous "maintaining status" system, which allowed journalists to remain in the U.S. indefinitely as long as they maintained their credentials with their media organizations. Chinese nationals will face an even shorter limit of 90 days.

A pathway opens for the government to deny extensions based on reporting it deems critical, and for the government to decide who is a journalist and who is not.

โ€” Gabe RottmanPolicy manager at the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) expressing concerns about the new rule.

This new regulation requires foreign journalists to apply for an extension with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and undergo a review process if they wish to stay beyond the initial 240-day period. Media advocacy groups have voiced strong opposition, fearing the rule could become a tool for the government to retaliate against critical reporting. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) warned that the government could effectively decide "who is a journalist and who is not," potentially creating an environment of self-censorship.

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) echoed these concerns, stating that a "cycle of renewals" could undermine press freedom. The National Press Club, a prominent U.S. journalists' organization, also issued a statement highlighting the potential for a "climate of fear and uncertainty" as foreign correspondents might avoid criticizing the U.S. government to ensure their visa renewals. Furthermore, they cautioned that this could prompt retaliatory measures against American journalists working overseas.

The cycle of renewals could force journalists into self-censorship, destroying press freedom.

โ€” Reporters Without Borders (RSF)RSF statement on the potential impact of the new U.S. visa rule on foreign journalists.

Practical challenges are also anticipated. Ian Williams, president of the Foreign Press Association, noted that the 240-day limit complicates long-term planning for housing and family arrangements, as it aligns poorly with standard leases and family reunification processes. The Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) questioned the security rationale, pointing out that foreign journalists already undergo extensive vetting. They also highlighted the financial burden of the over $400 fee for extension applications, particularly for freelance journalists.

It's not possible to sign a 240-day lease on an apartment, nor can you bring your spouse and children for only 240 days.

โ€” Ian WilliamsForeign Press Association (FPA) President Ian Williams discussing the practical difficulties of the new rule.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.