U.S. Navy dissatisfied with anti-radiation missile delays, seeks low-cost, rapid production new missile
Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The U.S. Navy is seeking a new, low-cost, rapidly produced anti-radiation missile to replace the delayed AGM-88G AARGM-ER.
- The Navy has restarted its Advanced Electromagnetic Suppression Missile (AESM) program, doubling annual production goals to 600 missiles.
- The new missile must match AARGM-ER's capabilities, including longer range and advanced anti-radiation seeker, for integration with F/A-18, EA-18G, and F-35 aircraft.
The U.S. Navy is actively seeking a new anti-radiation missile, aiming for a low-cost, rapidly produced alternative to the delayed AGM-88G Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile Extended Range (AARGM-ER). The Navy has revived its Advanced Electromagnetic Suppression Missile (AESM) program, significantly increasing its annual production target from 300 to 600 missiles.
This initiative stems from concerns over the AARGM-ER's development timeline, which has been pushed back due to issues with its rocket engine and software. The initial operational capability, originally slated for 2023, is now expected in September 2026. A recent U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report highlighted ongoing delays in software development and mass production, pushing the delivery of the first batch of missiles back by nearly three years.
The Navy's renewed request for information (RFI) for the AESM program specifies a need for missiles with capabilities equivalent to the AARGM-ER. Key requirements include extended range, an advanced anti-radiation seeker, broad electromagnetic wave search capabilities, and the ability to target modern air defense radars. These missiles are intended for integration with the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, EA-18G Growler, and F-35 fighter jets.
While the new RFI has removed a previous requirement for air-to-air combat capabilities, the potential for a dual-role anti-radiation and air-to-air missile remains a point of interest. Such a capability would enhance fighter jet efficiency and align with the U.S. military's future "Kill Web" operational framework, bolstering combat effectiveness against adversaries like China. The emphasis on low-cost design and doubled production targets suggests a broader Pentagon strategy to expand high-end missile production, reduce reliance on single suppliers, and build a more resilient defense industrial base for potential high-intensity conflicts.
Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.