U.S. Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejects Trump's restriction attempt
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The U.S. Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, rejecting an attempt by former President Donald Trump to restrict it.
- The ruling affirmed that individuals born on U.S. soil are citizens, even if their parents are undocumented or on temporary visas.
- Republican lawmakers plan to pursue legislative changes to alter the scope of birthright citizenship.
The U.S. Supreme Court has confirmed that birthright citizenship applies to all individuals born on American soil, even if their parents are in the country without authorization or on temporary visas. The decision, a 6-3 vote, rejected an executive order from former President Donald Trump that aimed to limit automatic citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants and temporary visa holders.
This ruling in the case known as Trump v. Barbara upholds a constitutional principle recognized for over a century through interpretations of the Fourteenth Amendment's citizenship clause. The court maintained the long-standing practice of granting citizenship to those born within U.S. territory.
Despite this judicial setback for the Trump administration's efforts, Republican lawmakers are signaling their intent to pursue changes to birthright citizenship through Congress. One such initiative is the Birthright Citizenship Act, introduced by Representative Brian Babin and Senator Lindsey Graham. This proposed legislation seeks to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to grant automatic citizenship only to children with at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen, national, legal permanent resident, or a member of the armed forces.
Proponents of the legislative effort argue that the phrase "subject to its jurisdiction" in the Fourteenth Amendment should be interpreted more narrowly to exclude children of irregular immigrants or those on temporary stays from automatic citizenship. However, the Supreme Court's decision currently preserves the existing constitutional interpretation.
Originally published by El Nacional in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.