DistantNews
Support us
Ukrainian couple challenges Irish law denying benefits over hotel stay
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland /Crime & Justice

Ukrainian couple challenges Irish law denying benefits over hotel stay

From Irish Times · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • A Ukrainian woman and her husband are challenging a law that disqualifies them from social welfare benefits due to their stay in designated accommodation.
  • The couple argues the law is "irrational" and "unfair," as it forces them to choose between housing and essential allowances.
  • The Supreme Court is considering the case, which questions the constitutional validity of distinctions made between different groups of displaced persons.

A Ukrainian woman and her husband are challenging a law that strips them of vital social welfare benefits, arguing it unfairly targets them for remaining in designated hotel accommodation. The couple, who fled the war in Ukraine in 2022, face a potential housing crisis as they are disqualified from disability and carer's allowances under a 2024 law.

irrational

โ€” Feichรญn McDonaghSenior counsel Feichรญn McDonagh describing the law excluding temporary protection applicants in designated accommodation centers from social welfare benefits.

Senior counsel Feichรญn McDonagh told the Supreme Court that the law is "irrational," "unfair," and "capricious," potentially breaching the Constitution. The woman, a wheelchair user, received โ‚ฌ208 weekly for disability, while her husband received โ‚ฌ224 for caregiving. Their hotel became a designated accommodation center in September 2024, triggering the disqualification. If they leave the hotel, they would regain eligibility for the benefits.

unfair

โ€” Feichรญn McDonaghSenior counsel Feichรญn McDonagh describing the law excluding temporary protection applicants in designated accommodation centers from social welfare benefits.

The High Court had previously rejected their challenge, with Justice Alexander Owens stating the law was merely disadvantageous, not discriminatory. He suggested that allowing temporary protection applicants full accommodation and board alongside social welfare would give them an advantage over Irish citizens. However, the couple secured a direct appeal to the Supreme Court, highlighting a "serious issue" with implications for many others.

capricious

โ€” Feichรญn McDonaghSenior counsel Feichรญn McDonagh describing the law excluding temporary protection applicants in designated accommodation centers from social welfare benefits.

The core of the appeal questions the constitutional validity of the distinction drawn between temporary protection recipients and international protection candidates, which underpinned the legislative changes. McDonagh argued that the amendments would force the couple out of their accommodation, creating immense difficulty for the woman to find suitable housing in a crisis. It would also compel her husband to work, preventing him from providing the 24-hour care she requires.

pushed out

โ€” Feichรญn McDonaghSenior counsel Feichรญn McDonagh explaining the potential consequences for the couple if they are forced to leave their accommodation.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Irish Times in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.