DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Elections & Politics

US and Iran enter '60-day negotiation war' over nuclear, Hormuz, and sanctions

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Ongoing story
  • The US and Iran are entering a 60-day negotiation period over the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's nuclear program, and sanctions.
  • Both sides are interpreting the preliminary agreement to their advantage, leading to conflicting claims about its terms.
  • Key disagreements persist regarding transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz and the extent of nuclear program limitations.

The United States and Iran are poised for a critical 60-day negotiation period following the preliminary signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), focusing on contentious issues including the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's nuclear program, and international sanctions. This phase marks a shift from battlefield confrontation to diplomatic engagement, with both nations already framing the outcome to their benefit.

The smell of corruption is everywhere. This event is just for Trump's birthday and has nothing to do with the spirit of America's founding.

โ€” Susan DouglasA quote from an activist with the progressive group Third Act Virginia, criticizing the event's purpose.

A central point of contention is the transit of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway for global oil transport. President Trump asserted that the agreement grants "unfettered opening" of the strait, suggesting a permanent end to transit fees. However, reports citing negotiation sources indicate the fee waiver is temporary, lasting only for the 60-day truce, with future management to be decided through regional dialogue. Iran, meanwhile, maintains its right to collect "service fees" for navigation and security, framing it not as a prohibited toll but as compensation for services rendered by Iran and Oman.

Disagreements also extend to Iran's nuclear activities. Iran's lead negotiator suggested that discussions would be limited to a "declaration of not pursuing nuclear weapons" and processing of enriched uranium. He indicated that Iran could re-enrich uranium domestically if needed. Conversely, President Trump claimed Iran would be permanently restricted to low-enriched uranium, unusable for military purposes, and proposed a 20-year, possibly 15-year, ban on enrichment. He also demanded the dilution and removal of Iran's existing stockpile of enriched uranium.

Iran is currently providing safety, navigation, and security services in the Strait of Hormuz and collecting fees for them. The right to collect these fees belongs entirely to Iran and Oman, and no other party has the authority to intervene. This system will be maintained regardless of any agreement.

โ€” Mahdi MohammadiIran's chief negotiator's strategic advisor, explaining Iran's stance on collecting fees in the Strait of Hormuz.

Economically, Iran is pressing for the release of frozen assets and sanctions relief. Tehran claims an agreement to release half of its $24 billion in frozen assets immediately, with the remainder to follow within 60 days. They also anticipate reconstruction plans worth at least $300 billion from the US and its allies, alongside the permanent lifting of UN sanctions. However, President Trump has denied these claims, reiterating that sanctions relief and asset releases are contingent on Iran fulfilling its commitments on nuclear issues.

Iran will permanently remain at the low-enriched level and will not be able to use it for military purposes.

โ€” Donald TrumpPresident Trump's assertion regarding Iran's uranium enrichment levels in a New York Times interview.

Former US officials express pessimism about the negotiations. Barack Obama questioned whether any new agreement could significantly improve upon the original JCPOA. Robert Malley, former US Special Envoy for Iran, criticized the recent conflict as a "costly catastrophe born of recklessness," suggesting that resolving the nuclear program and sanctions issues will be far more challenging than before the conflict.

Any agreement that comes out now, I question whether it can be significantly different or a major improvement compared to the agreement we initially made.

โ€” Barack ObamaFormer US President Obama expressing skepticism about the potential outcomes of the new US-Iran negotiations.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.