DistantNews
Support us
US appeals court rules Trump cannot implement mail-in voting order
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ Palestine /Elections & Politics

US appeals court rules Trump cannot implement mail-in voting order

From Times of Israel · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • A federal appeals court rejected the Trump administration's request to implement an executive order tightening mail-in voting rules in 23 states.
  • The court ruled that the order's challenges were not premature, as states must act quickly to comply with new voting procedures.
  • The Justice Department may ask the Supreme Court to intervene if the appeals court ruling stands.

A federal appeals court has blocked President Donald Trump's administration from enforcing an executive order that sought to tighten rules for mail-in voting in 23 states. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled Saturday that the administration's request to lift a lower court's injunction was not valid.

In June, a federal judge blocked key parts of the Republican president's order, concluding that it was unconstitutional. The Justice Department argued that the lawsuit was premature because federal agencies had not yet finalized actions to implement the directive. However, the appeals court, in a 2-1 decision, rejected this argument.

As the district court reasoned, the (executive order) lays out a clear set of rapidly approaching deadlines by which states must coordinate with federal officials and comply with new voting procedures, all while the states must also ensure that their officials and the public understand the evolving set of rules that would govern the upcoming September and November elections.

โ€” 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals judgesExplaining the court's reasoning for rejecting the administration's request to pause the lower court's ruling.

The judges stated that the executive order sets clear, rapidly approaching deadlines for states to coordinate with federal officials and adopt new voting procedures. They emphasized that states have no practical choice but to respond to the order immediately, as they must also ensure officials and the public understand the evolving rules for the upcoming September and November elections.

This ruling comes after a federal judge in Washington, D.C., previously rejected a similar effort by Democrats to block Trump's order. The Justice Department has warned that it might be forced to seek intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court if the 1st Circuit's decision is not overturned.

The Plaintiff States have no practical choice but to respond to the (order) now.

โ€” 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals judgesHighlighting the urgency for states to comply with the executive order.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Times of Israel. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.