DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand /Elections & Politics

US bill targets birthright citizenship in CNMI, Guam, other territories

From RNZ Pacific · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • A Republican congressman introduced a bill that would end automatic U.S. citizenship for people born in U.S. territories starting in 2027.
  • The legislation targets territories including Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).
  • Advocacy groups argue the bill is unconstitutional and could deny citizenship to anyone born in these territories, potentially leaving them stateless.

A proposed bill in the U.S. House of Representatives seeks to alter the criteria for birthright citizenship in U.S. territories, potentially affecting individuals born in Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) from January 1, 2027.

Just like Congress possesses the power to grant the territories Constitutional rights in statute, we have the power to take them away in statute.

โ€” Morgan GriffithRepublican rep introducing the bill, explaining his view on Congressional authority over territorial citizenship.

Introduced by Republican Representative Morgan Griffith, the "End Birthright Citizenship for Territories Act" argues that Congress has the authority to modify citizenship laws applicable to these territories. Griffith cited a recent Supreme Court decision, stating it "leaves the door open for Congressional action on citizenship in the American territories."

This dangerous and unconstitutional legislation highlights the problem with the Insular Cases and the idea that Congress has the power to simply turn constitutional rights on and off at will in U.S. territories.

โ€” Neil WeareCo-director of Right to Democracy, criticizing the proposed bill.

However, the legislation faces strong opposition from advocacy groups like Right to Democracy. Co-director Neil Weare criticized the bill as "dangerous and unconstitutional," warning that its broad language could deny citizenship to anyone born in a U.S. territory after 2027, potentially rendering them citizens of nowhere. Weare also noted that the bill's text is more sweeping than Griffith's stated aim of addressing "birth tourism."

The proposed amendments to federal statute are sweeping, and could mean that anyone born in a U.S. territory starting in 2027 would no longer be recognized as a US citizen, indeed, may not be a citizen of anywhere.

โ€” Neil WeareCo-director of Right to Democracy, detailing the potential broad impact of the bill.

Another concern raised by Right to Democracy co-director Adi Martinez Roman is the potential conflict with the Northern Mariana Islands' Covenant with the United States. This covenant requires mutual consent for changes to its citizenship provisions, a process the proposed legislation appears to bypass. The issue, according to Martinez Roman, transcends partisan politics, centering on fundamental rights within a democracy.

The question of federal power over citizenship in US territories is not a partisan or ideological issue - it is one of fundamental rights in a democracy.

โ€” Adi Martinez RomanCo-director of Right to Democracy, emphasizing the human rights aspect of the citizenship debate.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by RNZ Pacific in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.