DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland /Conflict & Security

US bombs three Iranian tankers as Tehran expands attacks

From Neue Zรผrcher Zeitung · () German

Translated from German and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Official statement Ongoing story
  • The United States struck three Iranian oil tankers after Iran targeted a US aircraft carrier and a destroyer in the Persian Gulf.
  • US Central Command said two tankers were rendered permanently inoperable, another was completely destroyed, and one sank.
  • Iran warned that it would expand attacks on US warships if Washington continued tanker strikes and maintained its blockade of Iranian ports.

The United States has bombed three Iranian tankers after Tehran took a step that it had avoided throughout the war: targeting an American aircraft carrier with ballistic missiles.

The strikes came after Donald Trump issued a new โ€œtanker for tankerโ€ doctrine, making oil carriers an apparent primary target of US attacks. US Central Command said two of the ships were โ€œpermanently disabledโ€ and another was โ€œcompletely destroyed.โ€ One tanker sank after the attacks, according to Centcom.

The Americans must understand that the time for proportionate responses is over.

· Mohammed Bagher GhalibafIran's parliament speaker warned that Tehran would respond more forcefully to attacks on its interests.

Iran also targeted a destroyer. Centcom said all the US ships under attack managed to evade the strikes without damage. But the decision to fire on an aircraft carrier has raised the prospect of a broader Iranian offensive. Without the carrier, the United States would have difficulty continuing its operations in the Persian Gulf.

The rules of the game have changed. From now on, attacks on Iranโ€™s interests will bring faster, harsher and more painful retaliation.

· Mohammed Bagher GhalibafGhalibaf described Iran's new response policy after the US tanker strikes.

Iranian military officials said attacks on American warships would expand if Washington continued attacking tankers and did not ease its naval blockade of Iranian ports. Parliament Speaker Mohammed Bagher Ghalibaf said, โ€œThe Americans must understand that the time for proportionate responses is over.โ€ He added, โ€œThe rules of the game have changed. From now on, attacks on Iranโ€™s interests will bring faster, harsher and more painful retaliation.โ€

The United States showed no sign of backing down. Admiral Brad Cooper, commander of the American regional command for the Middle East, said, โ€œThe message to the Iranian Revolutionary Guards is clear: If you fire on two of our ships, we will impose even higher economic costs on you by taking out three of your ships.โ€ While Tehran escalates near its own shores, the article says it has held back from aiding Hezbollah as Israel continues advancing in southern Lebanon.

The message to the Iranian Revolutionary Guards is clear: If you fire on two of our ships, we will impose even higher economic costs on you by taking out three of your ships.

· Brad CooperThe US regional commander defended the strikes as a response to attacks on American vessels.
About this summary

Originally published by Neue Zรผrcher Zeitung in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.