US House approves defense budget exceeding $1 trillion, eyes missile shield
Translated from German, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The U.S. House of Representatives approved a defense budget of over $1 trillion for the fiscal year 2027.
- The approved National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) includes provisions for developing a missile defense shield and increasing military pay by 5-7%.
- The bill now moves to the Senate for approval, where its passage is uncertain due to fiscal discipline concerns within the Republican party.
The U.S. House of Representatives has approved a defense budget exceeding $1.15 trillion for the fiscal year 2027, marking a record allocation for the Department of Defense. This decision, part of the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), passed narrowly with a vote of 216 in favor and 212 against, reflecting a bipartisan effort typically seen in defense spending legislation.
The approved NDAA proposes a significant increase of approximately $250 billion compared to the 2026 budget. A key initiative funded by this increase is the development of a missile defense shield, inspired by Israel's "Iron Dome" system, a project reportedly pushed by President Donald Trump. Additionally, the bill mandates a pay raise of 5-7% for military personnel.
Furthermore, the legislation includes a provision to rename the Department of Defense to the "Department of War." However, this change, along with the overall budget, requires approval from the Senate, the other chamber of the U.S. Congress.
The Senate's decision remains uncertain. While Republicans hold a majority in the Senate, some within the party who advocate for strict fiscal discipline are reportedly concerned that the substantial increase in defense spending is not balanced by corresponding cuts elsewhere in the budget. The outcome in the Senate will determine the finalization of these defense strategy and budget plans.
Originally published by Die Zeit in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.