DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar /Crime & Justice

US Judge Rejects Trump's Attempt to Move Hush-Money Case to Federal Court

From Al Jazeera · () English

Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • A US judge has denied Donald Trump's request for the third time to move his state-level hush-money case to federal court.
  • The judge ruled that Trump's arguments for immunity, based on a Supreme Court decision, were insufficient, stating that paying hush money is not covered by presidential immunity.
  • Trump's legal team plans to appeal the decision, calling the judge's ruling 'baseless and lawless' and vowing to fight the 'weaponization' of the justice system.

A US judge has once again rejected Donald Trump's efforts to transfer his criminal hush-money case from state to federal court, dealing another blow to his attempts to overturn his felony conviction.

Judge Alvin Hellerstein dismissed Trump's petition for the third time on Friday, stating that the arguments presented were neither new nor legally sufficient. Hellerstein specifically ruled that presidential immunity does not extend to actions like paying hush money or covering up personal embarrassments, directly countering Trump's legal strategy which relied on a recent Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity.

Trump, who became the first US president to be convicted of a crime in 2024, was found guilty by a New York jury on 34 counts of falsifying business records. Prosecutors argued these actions were intended to conceal payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels to avoid negative publicity during his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump has consistently denied any sexual liaison with Daniels.

Paying hush money to an adult film star or engaging in a cover-up of an embarrassment are not subsumed in presidential immunity.

โ€” Judge Alvin HellersteinRuling on Trump's petition to move the case to federal court.

Despite the judge's ruling, Trump's lawyers have announced their intention to file a strong appeal. They denounced Hellersteinโ€™s judgment as "baseless and lawless" and issued a statement asserting that President Trump "will continue defeating Democrat weaponization at every turn."

The case centers on a $130,000 payment allegedly made by Trump through his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to silence Daniels. While falsifying business records is typically a misdemeanor, it becomes a felony in New York if committed in service of another crime, such as influencing an election. Prosecutors contended that Trump's actions were aimed at unlawfully influencing the 2016 election outcome.

President Trump will be filing a powerful appeal, and will continue defeating Democrat weaponization at every turn.

โ€” Trump's legal teamStatement following the judge's rejection of the transfer request.
About this summary

Originally published by Al Jazeera in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.