US pivot from strikes to sanctions in Iran war shows lack of clear strategy, experts say

Experts are questioning the strategic coherence of the United States' approach to Iran, particularly the pivot from military strikes to a focus on sanctions and economic pressure. Dr. Lynette Nusbacher, a military historian, described the U.S. involvement in the conflict as lacking a "coherent policy, without clear strategy, and without even trying to create a coalition to support the operation."

“

America’s impatience in this war has brought the US into the conflict without coherent policy, without clear strategy, and without even trying to create a coalition to support the operation.

This shift follows reports that U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio informed foreign counterparts that the U.S. would temporarily cease strikes against Iran, prioritizing sanctions. A State Department spokesman stated that the goal is to "cut off every financial lifeline the regime has remaining," as Iran's economy faces severe strain. The Iranian rial hit a record low against the dollar, and reports suggest the country is experiencing severe inflation, despite denials from Iran's Central Bank Governor.

“

for the time being

However, Iran has signaled its continued resolve to control the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway. The Iranian Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee has advanced plans to impose fees on vessels transiting the strait. This indicates that despite the economic pressure, Iran is not compromising on its strategic objectives.

“

The Iranian economy is in free fall, and the regime's military has been decimated, and we are cutting off every financial lifeline the regime has remaining.

Analysts at the Institute for the Study of War have consistently assessed that financial pressure alone is unlikely to compel Iranian officials to compromise. Nusbacher characterized Washington's move as "desperate" to exit the conflict, a sentiment she believes the Iranian regime fully understands. The war, she explained, has become a test of endurance, pitting the global economy's tolerance for oil supply disruptions against Iran's ability to withstand blockades and airstrikes. Given its history, Nusbacher suggested Tehran is likely to persevere, especially with what she perceives as a lack of fully conceived strategic aims and mechanisms from the U.S. at the outset.

“

The Iranian regime was baptized in blood during the Iran-Iraq War, and from an Iranian point of view the desultory American missile attacks of the past few months have been