Vance vs. Rubio: Trump's jokes fuel 2028 succession speculation
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Donald Trump's recent jokes about Vice President JD Vance have fueled speculation about his 2028 presidential pick.
- Vance is reportedly opposed to the ongoing war in Iran, creating a difficult situation as he is tasked with negotiating peace.
- Trump appears to be enjoying the competition between Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio for his potential endorsement.
Donald Trump's recent remarks, delivered with his characteristic humor, have intensified speculation about his preferred successor for the 2028 presidential election, particularly focusing on Vice President JD Vance. The former president's jokes, often at others' expense, have now turned towards his own vice president, suggesting a potential shift in his political calculus.
This way, if it works out, I'm going to take the credit. If it doesn't work out, I'm blaming JD. You better be careful, JD.
The context of Vance's involvement in the ongoing war in Iran adds a layer of complexity. Reports indicate Vance opposed the US decision to engage in the conflict, yet he has been appointed to negotiate a peace deal. This puts him in a precarious position, tasked with ending a war he reportedly did not support, a situation presidential historian Matthew Dallek describes as "excruciatingly difficult."
"He reportedly was opposed to the war, the only senior administration official to oppose it. But now he's stuck with the war because he's Trump's vice-president," Dallek explained. "So there is no world in which JD Vance can suddenly say, 'Oh, I was opposed to a policy before I was for it'."
JD Vance is in an excruciatingly difficult spot. He reportedly was opposed to the war, the only senior administration official to oppose it. But now he's stuck with the war because he's Trump's vice-president.
Adding to the intrigue, Trump has also offered glowing reviews of Secretary of State Marco Rubio's diplomatic efforts. Trump himself seems to be relishing the emerging competition, engaging audiences by asking, "Who's it gonna be? Is it gonna be JD, is it gonna be somebody else? I don't know."
So there is no world in which JD Vance can suddenly say, 'Oh, I was opposed to a policy before I was for it'.
Trump's public musings, such as his quip about taking credit if Vance succeeds in Iran or blaming him if he fails, highlight his strategic use of public statements. "This way, if it works out, I'm going to take the credit," Trump quipped. "If it doesn't work out, I'm blaming JD. You better be careful, JD."
Who's it gonna be? Is it gonna be JD, is it gonna be somebody else? I don't know.
Originally published by ABC Australia in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.