Veterans Furious Over Healthcare Changes After Senator's Surgery Ordeal
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Senator Jacqui Lambie shared her personal struggle with accessing vaginal prolapse surgery through the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA).
- Veterans are concerned about upcoming changes to DVA healthcare, including a $5,000 threshold for allied health services that will face new scrutiny.
- The government faces pressure over the changes, with the Veterans Affairs Minister admitting he "got it wrong" in initially declining a meeting with concerned veterans.
Senator Jacqui Lambie has spoken out about her personal difficulties in obtaining surgery for vaginal prolapse, highlighting challenges faced by female veterans seeking care through the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). Lambie revealed she ultimately paid for her surgery out-of-pocket, stating that many other female veterans would face long waits for DVA approval and then struggle to find a gynecologist willing to accept the low rates paid by the department. "That's how much they care about our vaginas," she declared in parliament, visibly emotional.
If I was like the majority of female veterans, I would have had to wait for DVA to approve my claim.
Lambie connected her experience to broader concerns among veterans regarding upcoming changes to how the DVA manages access to allied healthcare. Starting mid-next year, a $5,000 annual threshold will be implemented for veterans' spending on allied health services. While the government insists it is not a cap, spending above this amount will be subject to "clinically effective" scrutiny. Lambie noted that while her specific surgery wasn't directly impacted, such a threshold could affect her access to post-surgery physiotherapy.
And then I would have to search, and hope, and hope, that there would be a gynaecologist that would accept the low rate paid by DVA.
The government is facing significant pressure over these planned changes. The situation was exacerbated when Veterans Affairs Minister Matt Keogh admitted he "got it wrong" after initially refusing to meet with veterans worried about the threshold. Government sources indicate that the issue is being considered at the highest levels, including the prime minister's office.
That's how much they care about our vaginas.
The $5,000 threshold, announced in the May budget, is described as an "annual monetary limit" intended to save approximately $750 million over three years. The government aims to curb "over-servicing," where the volume of appointments and services lacks clinical justification. Department figures show only about 10% of veteran cardholders exceed $5,000 annually on allied health. Examples of extreme overcharging, such as a dietitian billing $101,000 in a year for 19 weekly appointments, and podiatry costs reaching $47,000 for one veteran, were presented to the Senate as justification for the new threshold.
got it wrong
Originally published by ABC Australia in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.