DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia /Crime & Justice

Veterans receive millions more in abuse compensation after court forces review

From ABC Australia · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • The Defence Force Ombudsman paid an additional $7 million in compensation to veterans for abuse after a court case highlighted the scheme's failure to consider psychological impacts.
  • A federal court ruling prompted a review of nearly 2,000 claims under the Defence Abuse Reparation Scheme (DARS), which ceased payments in mid-2023.
  • Some veterans and their lawyers criticized the review process, citing a lack of communication and opportunity to appeal decisions.

Dozens of veterans will receive millions more in compensation for abuse after a federal court case forced the Defence Force Ombudsman to reassess its reparation scheme. The Defence Abuse Reparation Scheme (DARS) initially only considered the severity of assaults, neglecting the ongoing psychological toll on victims.

The abuse has had substantial and enduring physical and psychological effects.

โ€” Luke ArmstrongMatthew's lawyer, Luke Armstrong, described the lasting impact of the abuse his client experienced.

Following a challenge in federal court this year, the ombudsman conceded its error and launched a voluntary review of claims. Around 2,000 cases were eligible, and nearly 200 decisions have been remade. The scheme, which paid out over $75 million for some 5,000 reported abuses, stopped making payments in mid-2023.

I think the handling of this internal review has not been managed very well.

โ€” Luke ArmstrongLawyer Luke Armstrong criticized the ombudsman's management of the review process.

However, the review process has drawn criticism. Lawyer Luke Armstrong, who represents several veterans, stated some clients were only notified of their case reassessment via email informing them of an additional payment. He argued this denied them the chance to appeal decisions that did not result in an increased payment. One client, identified only as Matthew, received an additional $25,000 after his claim was upgraded, but his lawyer felt the review was poorly managed and clients should have been informed earlier and given legal advice opportunities.

I do think that it would have been a lot more appropriate to have given clients the ability to one, know that their case has been reopened and two, once they have actually received an upgrade, allowing them the ability to get legal advice first.

โ€” Luke ArmstrongLuke Armstrong outlined how he believed the review process should have been handled.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by ABC Australia in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.