DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom /Conflict & Security

Veterans slam Pentagon's Iran war casualty reclassification as 'huge disrespect'

From The Guardian · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • US military veterans criticize the Pentagon's reclassification of Iran war casualties as disrespectful to the dead.
  • The Department of Defense added a new category, "Overseas Operations," for personnel killed and wounded starting July 7, separating them from the US-Israel war on Iran.
  • Veterans argue this change, particularly affecting Latinos, minimizes accountability and erases service members' sacrifices, likening it to past data manipulation.

US military veterans are decrying a recent Pentagon decision to reclassify casualties from the Iran war as a profound "disrespect" to fallen service members and their families. The move, made through a quiet update to the Defense Casualty Analysis System (DCAS) database, introduced a new category labeled "Overseas Operations" for personnel killed and wounded since July 7.

Itโ€™s such a huge disrespect for the families. To claim that they werenโ€™t killed as a result of the war โ€“ oh, it was just overseas operations โ€“ is just ludicrous.

โ€” Michael E SmithA retired US rear admiral and founder of National Security Leaders for America, commenting on the Pentagon's reclassification of casualties.

This new classification separates these casualties from the ongoing US-Israel war on Iran. Four US service members killed in action by Iranian forces now fall under this "Overseas Operations" designation. Retired Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith, founder of National Security Leaders for America, called the reclassification "ludicrous" and a "huge disrespect." He noted that the Pentagon, renamed the Department of War under Donald Trump, had previously manipulated casualty data during the Vietnam War.

I definitely think that this isnโ€™t an issue just about numbers, but also about accountability.

โ€” Tristeza OrdexA US Marine Corps veteran and national organizer for partnerships and engagement at VoteVets, discussing the implications of the new casualty category.

Tristeza Ordex, a US Marine Corps veteran and national organizer for VoteVets, emphasized that the issue extends beyond mere numbers to accountability. She expressed particular concern for service members like Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, a 19-year-old Latina casualty, whose sacrifice might be overlooked. "It feels like erasure," Ordex stated, highlighting the exclusion of individuals who paid the ultimate price for their country.

Not only are Latinos being excluded from so much more and being targeted: we have this person that paid the ultimate sacrifice for this country who isnโ€™t even being recognized as a casualty of this war, so it feels like erasure.

โ€” Tristeza OrdexA US Marine Corps veteran expressing concern over the potential erasure of service members' sacrifices, particularly for minority groups.

The War Powers Act of 1973 requires presidential military operations to end within 60 days unless Congress authorizes an extension. The Trump administration's interpretation, which paused the clock on May 1 following a ceasefire, underpins the separate casualty count starting July 7. Veterans like Smith see this administrative change as a deliberate attempt to minimize reported deaths, suggesting that "their boss doesn't want to hear about deaths."

Itโ€™s so disrespectful to our service members who gave their lives, and the only reason they died was because Donald Trump decided to do this illegal war.

โ€” Michael E SmithRetired Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith criticizing the administration's decision and its impact on service members' legacies.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Guardian in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.