Veterinarians: Public tender for public authorities is compromised, rules not applied equally
Translated from Croatian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Croatian veterinarians and livestock farmers claim a public tender for veterinary services is compromised.
- They allege that the tender rules are not applied equally, potentially leading to the closure of 15 rural clinics and leaving 50 towns without local veterinarians.
- The tender, worth approximately 20 million euros, is funded by the state budget.
Veterinary organizations and a citizens' initiative for the salvation of Croatian livestock are demanding the immediate suspension and annulment of a public tender for veterinary services, which they claim is compromised and unfairly applied.
The tender, issued by the Ministry of Agriculture, concerns the allocation of public authority tasks in veterinary medicine. Veterinarians and farmers warn that its implementation could result in the closure of about 15 rural clinics and leave approximately 50 towns without local veterinary care. The value of these contracts is estimated at around 20 million euros, funded by the state budget.
Natjeฤaj Ministarstva poljoprivrede za dodjelu poslova javnih ovlasti u veterinarstvu zbog kojeg bi 15-ak seoskih ambulanti moglo biti zatvoreno, a 50-ak gradova i opฤina ostati bez lokalnog veterinara je kompromitiran u samoj provedbi
Veterinarian Vesna Knapiฤ presented two findings, arguing that the rules are not applied consistently. She pointed out that the bid from Veterinarska stanica Varaลพdin, an organization that generated approximately 8 million euros in revenue in 2025 from the Ministry of Agriculture and the State Inspectorate, the highest in Croatia, did not include the required professional liability insurance policy. Instead, it contained an insurance offer, which is not a valid policy. Knapiฤ stated that incomplete bids should be rejected according to the tender conditions, and the committee's failure to do so constitutes a breach of its own criteria.
Pri dodjeli javnih ovlasti odluฤujuฤi kriteriji moraju biti struฤnost, rezultati rada, iskustvo i prisutnost na terenu, a ne kriteriji koji pogoduju velikim sustavima na ลกtetu lokalnih ambulanti i hrvatskog sela
Furthermore, Knapiฤ revealed that a veterinary technician without a professional exam was awarded points in the Varaลพdin bid. Conversely, the bid from Veterinarska stanica Novi Marof was rejected precisely because its veterinary technician lacked the required professional exam. "The same omission, two opposite outcomes, one in favor of the largest, the other to the detriment of a smaller organization," she stated.
Antonela Wendling, a veterinarian from Ivankovo, expressed concern that after 27 years of service in her own municipality, where she helped contain African swine fever and protect surrounding settlements, her clinic might lose public authority status. She argued that criteria for awarding public authority should prioritize expertise, work results, experience, and field presence, rather than favoring large systems at the expense of local clinics and rural communities. Wendling also highlighted a potential conflict of interest, noting that Siniลกa Mandek, head of the veterinary activity organization sector, who helped draft the tender rules, also chairs the committee deciding on the awards and personally approves payments to veterinary organizations.
Uvjete natjeฤaja i pravilnik kreirao je Siniลกa Mandek, naฤelnik Sektora za organizaciju veterinarske djelatnosti, zajedno s ravnateljicom Uprave Tatjanom Karaฤiฤ. Mandek je ujedno predsjednik povjerenstva koje odluฤuje o dodjeli poslova javnih ovlasti, a k tome osobno provjerava i odobrava raฤune koje veterinarske organizacije ispostavljaju na naplatu Upravi za veterinarstvo i sigurnost hrane. Ista osoba, dakle, piลกe pravila, odluฤuje tko dobiva poslove i odobrava im isplate javnog novca
Originally published by Veฤernji List in Croatian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.