Vodafone suffers setback in dispute with 1&1 over mobile networks
Translated from German and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- The Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court rejected Vodafone’s emergency application seeking to stop Germany’s competition authority from ruling in a market-abuse case involving 1&1.
- The decision allows the Federal Cartel Office to proceed with its separate investigation into whether Vodafone hindered 1&1’s network expansion.
- Vodafone denies influencing infrastructure operator Vantage Towers, while the competition authority has provisionally said the delayed provision of sites may have unlawfully obstructed 1&1.
Vodafone has suffered a legal setback in its dispute with rival 1&1. The Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court rejected the mobile operator’s emergency application, according to the court in response to a dpa inquiry.
Vodafone had gone to court last autumn to challenge allegations of market abuse. It sought to have the Federal Cartel Office declared biased and conflicted, a move that could have improved Vodafone’s position in its dispute with 1&1. The court’s decision means Vodafone cannot obtain the preventive legal protection it requested before the authority issues a decision.
The separate proceedings in Bonn concern 1&1’s attempt to build its own mobile network. The company acquired its first mobile frequencies in 2019 and later began constructing a network intended to compete with Deutsche Telekom, O2 and Vodafone. By early 2023, however, 1&1 had only five operating mobile sites instead of the 1,000 required under a government expansion obligation.
Much of the delay involved infrastructure operator Vantage Towers, which supplied 1&1 with far fewer sites than its contract required. Vantage Towers was spun off from Vodafone’s former radio-tower division, and Vodafone remained its largest shareholder. 1&1 suspected that Vodafone had influenced Vantage Towers to restrict access for the competitor, allegations Vodafone and Vantage Towers denied.
The Federal Cartel Office opened a market-abuse case in 2023. In spring 2025, its president, Andreas Mundt, said the delayed provision of sites appeared to constitute an unlawful restriction of 1&1. Vodafone then sought to block a final ruling by challenging the authority’s impartiality. A Vodafone spokesman said the court had not decided the bias question itself, but had rejected only the unusual attempt to secure legal protection before the cartel authority’s decision.
the delayed provision of sites should be considered an unlawful obstruction of 1&1
Originally published by Die Zeit in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.