'We think Tehran, they think Taiwan': Israeli official exposes US-Israel strategic divide

Israel perceives Iran as a more significant threat than the United States does, leading to differing policy decisions and priorities, according to Amir Baram, Director-General of the Ministry of Defense. Speaking at a conference, Baram stated that while both nations recognize Iran as a threat, Israel considers it existential, whereas the U.S. views it as a "chronic regional challenge." He elaborated that the U.S. focus remains on China and the Indo-Pacific theater, leading to a situation where "We think Tehran, they think Taiwan."

“

The difference between us is not in how we understand the threat, but in our priorities: for us, Iran is an existential threat; for the United States, it is a chronic regional challenge, while China and the Indo-Pacific theater remain the core concern. We think Tehran, they think Taiwan.

Baram advised against interpreting U.S. policy through a narrow lens, suggesting that what might appear as disregard for warnings in Israel is actually "cold, calculated, and clear-eyed risk management" from Washington's perspective in an era of shifting global attention. He also addressed criticism of Israel and Iran from the Pentagon, explaining that a prolonged Middle East war conflicts with America's global posture, especially with munitions stretched thin by support for current conflicts and preparations for potential confrontation in the Taiwan Strait.

“

What some in Israel perceive as weakness or folly, an apparent disregard for every warning sign on the ground, is viewed in Washington as cold, calculated, and clear-eyed risk management in an era of shifting global attention.

Looking ahead to the next Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) governing the Israeli-U.S. military relationship after 2028, Baram emphasized that it must be founded on "hard interests." He asserted that a strong, independent, and proactive Israel that stabilizes the Middle East serves as a crucial asset, enabling the United States to reallocate resources toward Asia. This partnership, he concluded, cannot rely solely on shared values but must generate tangible security, economic, and strategic benefits for both nations.

“

From the Pentagon's perspective, with American munitions stretched between supporting current wars and preparing for a potential confrontation in the Taiwan Strait, a prolonged war in the Middle East runs counter to America's global posture.