West African journalism network demands probe of journalists’ ejection from Akwa Ibom court
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Cell Norbert Zongo for Investigative Journalism in West Africa (CENOZO) condemned the ejection of journalists from a Nigerian court.
- CENOZO called for an independent judicial inquiry into the incident at Magistrate Court 7 in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State.
- The organization emphasized the importance of open justice and media access to court proceedings, urging the Chief Judge to reaffirm judicial impartiality and the media's constitutional role.
A prominent West African journalism network has demanded an independent judicial inquiry into the reported ejection of journalists from a magistrate court in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. The Cell Norbert Zongo for Investigative Journalism in West Africa (CENOZO), based in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, issued a statement expressing grave concerns over press freedom and transparency in Nigeria's justice system.
The incident occurred at Magistrate Court 7, where journalists covering a criminal case involving alleged farmland destruction by cattle herders were ordered out. Notably, investigative journalist Ibanga Isine, who is also the complainant, was removed by police officers on the magistrate's orders after questioning his exclusion.
CENOZO stated that the exclusion of journalists raises serious questions about adherence to the principle of open justice, a cornerstone of democratic societies. The organization stressed that journalists act as society's eyes and ears, and restricting their access undermines public confidence in the judiciary. They pointed out that the proceedings were not declared in camera nor justified by any legal exception for excluding the press.
The network urged the Chief Judge of Akwa Ibom State to establish an inquiry to investigate potential breaches of judicial and constitutional safeguards regarding public access to court proceedings. CENOZO also called for clear directives to be issued, reaffirming judicial impartiality, the media's constitutional role, and the public's right to attend court sessions, except where legally restricted. The organization reiterated its commitment to defending media freedom and access to justice.
The principle of open justice is a cornerstone of democratic societies. Journalists serve as the eyes and ears of society, ensuring citizens are informed about the workings of public institutions. Any unjustified restriction on media access risks undermining public confidence in the administration of justice.
Originally published by Premium Times. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.