DistantNews
Support us

What would Menachem Begin say about democracy’s state in today’s Likud? - editorial

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Opinion Named sources Context piece
  • The Likud party's internal democracy is questioned, with accusations that the Prime Minister's Office pressured officials to support the leader's proposals.
  • Veteran MK David Bitan stated that officials felt pressure due to the Prime Minister's influence over appointments and potential dismissals.
  • The editorial argues that a party renowned for internal debate has shifted, potentially weakening its democratic foundation.

The Likud party, tracing its origins to Menachem Begin's Herut movement, is facing scrutiny over its internal democratic processes. A recent editorial in the Jerusalem Post suggests that the party, once built on the freedom to disagree, may be deviating from its foundational principles. Begin himself emphasized that "without an opposition, there can be no democracy; without it, the essence of human liberty is in danger," a principle the editorial argues should extend to internal party workings.

We are convinced – as we have witnessed throughout the world – that without an opposition, there can be no democracy; without it, the essence of human liberty is in danger.

— Menachem BeginQuoted to illustrate the principle of democratic opposition within a party.

Veteran Likud MK David Bitan voiced concerns, alleging that the Prime Minister's Office contacted ministers and MKs, soliciting videos in support of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's proposals ahead of an internal party vote. Bitan stated that officials felt pressured due to the Prime Minister's significant influence over appointments and potential dismissals, impacting their willingness to express dissent before a primary vote.

The prime minister really wanted appointments rather than [internal] elections. But following the petitions we filed and the public pressure we created, he has essentially agreed to primaries.

— David BitanDescribing the internal party dynamics and pressure regarding leadership elections.

This situation has led to questions about whether Likud has lost its value of strong internal debate. MK Dan Illouz had previously warned against weakening the party's primary system, expressing pride in Likud being "the only democratic party right now in the Knesset." However, recent events suggest a shift away from robust internal discourse, prompting concerns that the party's democratic framework, even its internal court's eventual order for primaries to proceed, is under strain.

The prime minister appoints them as ministers; the prime minister can dismiss them from those positions. The prime minister has influence over many party members in the primaries, so people are under pressure. They’re afraid in this situation.

— David BitanExplaining the source of pressure felt by party members.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.