DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates /Crime & Justice

WhatsApp messages help lender recover Dh120,000 after borrower ignores repayment requests

From Khaleej Times · () English

Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Documents & data Outcome reported
  • An Abu Dhabi court ordered a borrower to repay a Dh120,000 loan and pay Dh15,000 in compensation after he allegedly stopped responding to the lender.
  • Bank transfer receipts and WhatsApp messages showed that the borrower received the money and repeatedly promised to repay it.
  • The court said the debt remained unpaid and that withholding the money deprived the lender of its use and caused distress.

WhatsApp messages and two bank transfers helped an Abu Dhabi lender prove that a Dh120,000 emergency loan remained unpaid. The Abu Dhabi Family, Civil and Administrative Claims Court ordered the borrower to return the full amount and pay Dh15,000 in compensation.

The lender told the court that the borrower had requested the money after an unexpected emergency and promised to repay it. The payments were made in two instalments, Dh20,000 followed by Dh100,000. When repayment was due, the lender said, the borrower began avoiding calls and messages.

The lender filed a civil lawsuit seeking the return of the money and compensation for being deprived of its use. As evidence, he submitted receipts for both bank transfers and WhatsApp conversations in which the borrower acknowledged receiving the funds and repeatedly promised to pay them back.

The borrower admitted receiving the full Dh120,000. He said he had borrowed it because of an emergency and had always intended to repay it, but argued that the parties had never agreed on a specific repayment date. He denied refusing to pay and attributed the delay to further financial difficulties. He asked the court to reject any claim beyond the original debt and dismiss the compensation request.

The court found that the admission, transfer receipts and messages clearly established the debt and showed it remained unpaid. Judges said a person cannot retain someone else's money without a legal reason and must return what they received. They also ruled that withholding the money deprived the lender of its use and caused emotional distress.

About this summary

Originally published by Khaleej Times in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.