DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand /Crime & Justice

Who is responsible? Fiji operation to remove street dwellers faces glaring lack of clarity

From RNZ Pacific · () English

Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Named sources Ongoing story
  • Fiji authorities have provided conflicting explanations of an operation involving the removal of beggars and street dwellers from public spaces.
  • Police, the Lautoka City Council and the Ministry of Women, Children and Social Protection have not clearly explained their roles or the support available to people being moved.
  • Lautoka's chairman says the effort is welfare-led and involves profiling people and suggesting relocation, while police say they may use necessary force if required.

Fiji's effort to clear beggars and street dwellers from public spaces has become a contest of competing explanations, with no clear answer about who is responsible for support or what happens after people are moved.

The operation has been presented as a joint effort by the Lautoka City Council, Fiji Police and the Ministry of Women, Children and Social Protection. In August, city rangers reportedly issued warning notices to people soliciting alms in public areas. The notices said persistent begging or obstructing footpaths were offences that could lead to "enforcement actions."

There is no forced relocation here. We can't force anybody.

โ€” Ratu Tevita MomoedonuThe Lautoka City Council chairman denied that the operation forcibly removes people from public spaces.

Questions about the operation's practical rules remain unanswered. Authorities have not clearly explained what triggers a warning, what happens if someone refuses to leave, which support programmes are available, or how responsibilities are divided among the agencies. The ministry's office declined to comment on its role or the programmes offered to people moved from public spaces. Police Commissioner Rusiate Tudravu's office said officers were present to "ensure the safety of all parties" and would "use necessary force" if required, but gave no detailed explanation of what that meant.

ensure the safety of all parties

โ€” Rusiate TudravuThe Fiji police commissionerโ€™s office described the role of police in the operation.

Lautoka City Council chairman and acting chief executive Ratu Tevita Momoedonu rejected suggestions that people were being forcibly removed. "There is no forced relocation here. We can't force anybody," he said. He described the initiative as welfare-led, saying street dwellers were profiled, invited to meetings and told about the benefits of moving to shelters and rehabilitation services.

Momoedonu also said the council could not explain the support programmes. "The rehabilitation part, the relocation part, it is their responsibility, not" the council's, he said, referring to the ministry and police. Civil society organisations have expressed concern that enforcement may be moving faster than the support systems needed to sustain it.

use necessary force

โ€” Rusiate TudravuThe police commissionerโ€™s office said officers could use force if required.
About this summary

Originally published by RNZ Pacific in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.