Zapatero's daughters and secretary implicated in influence-peddling case

Spanish justice has broadened its investigation into alleged influence peddling, formally implicating the two daughters and a long-time secretary of former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. The probe, dubbed the "Plus Ultra" case, centers on the public rescue of the airline Plus Ultra during the COVID-19 pandemic.

National Court Judge José Luis Calama has summoned Alba and Laura Rodríguez Espinosa, along with Gertrudis Alcázar, to appear as "investigated persons." According to a court statement, Zapatero's daughters are listed as owners of the company Whathefav, which investigators believe played an instrumental role in facilitating or concealing relevant transactions related to the case.

The investigation scrutinizes whether Zapatero, who served as prime minister from 2004 to 2011, used his influence to favor the airline's rescue with public funds, allegedly in exchange for financial benefits. The airline received 53 million euros during the pandemic crisis. This development is significant as it represents the first time a Spanish prime minister, whether currently in office or retired, faces a formal judicial investigation.

Zapatero appeared before the judge on Wednesday, vehemently denying any wrongdoing and was released without bail, despite the prosecutor's request for his passport to be surrendered. In a subsequent statement, the former socialist leader asserted his complete innocence, stating, "I am accused of very serious crimes that I have not committed."

However, the investigating judge maintains that there are indications Zapatero led a "stable and hierarchical structure of influence peddling" aimed at receiving bribes. The investigation also encompasses a potential tax offense, following the discovery of jewelry and watches valued at over 1.3 million euros in Zapatero's office safe, the origin of which remains unverified. Press reports suggest these items may have been gifts from a Saudi leader.

Regarding the imputation of Zapatero's daughters, the judge cited the need to protect their procedural rights. He argued that summoning them as witnesses would conflict with their potential legal responsibility, as it would compel them to testify under oath. As investigated parties, they can exercise their constitutional right to remain silent and not incriminate themselves.