70 Companies Exceed 1 Million Tons of Greenhouse Gases Annually, Making Up 65% of Domestic Emissions

A recent analysis reveals that a select group of 70 South Korean companies, dubbed the '1 million-ton club,' are responsible for a staggering 65.6% of the nation's total greenhouse gas emissions. These corporate giants, each emitting over a million tons annually, highlight the significant concentration of carbon output within a relatively small number of industrial players.

The report, compiled by a collaborative research team, indicates that the top nine emitters alone surpass 10 million tons per year. Prominent among these are major players in the steel industry, such as POSCO and Hyundai Steel, alongside semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, cement producers like Ssangyong C&E, and oil refineries including S-Oil and GS Caltex. These companies represent critical sectors of the Korean economy, yet their substantial emissions present a major challenge to the country's climate goals.

“

Whether the major emitters succeed in reducing greenhouse gas emissions is the key to the success of national carbon neutrality.

While the power generation sector has seen reductions in emissions, largely attributed to the government's energy transition policies moving away from coal-fired plants towards liquefied natural gas (LNG) and renewable energy sources, the industrial sector presents a more concerning picture. Despite a superficial decrease, emissions from private companies, excluding the power sector, show minimal voluntary reduction efforts. In fact, sectors like petrochemicals, refining, and semiconductors have seen notable increases in emissions.

This disparity underscores a critical issue: the success of South Korea's carbon neutrality efforts hinges heavily on the actions of these major emitters. The research team points out that the perceived stagnation or increase in industrial emissions is a result of a combination of factors, including corporate priorities that favor short-term profits over long-term climate action and a government hesitant to implement stringent regulations due to concerns about industrial competitiveness. This dynamic necessitates a more robust and proactive approach from both industry and government to effectively tackle the climate crisis.

“

The industrial sector's emissions appear to be stagnant, or even increasing in some sectors, when excluding the power sector. This is a result of corporate inertia that prioritizes short-term profits over long-term climate crisis response, combined with the government's hesitant attitude in imposing strong regulations due to concerns about industrial competitiveness.