DistantNews
Support us
🇦🇷 Argentina /Elections & Politics

A new Comodoro Py? Kirchnerism’s encrypted message and the court targeting Cristina

From La Nación · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Analysis Named sources New plan
  • Kirchnerist senators backed Pablo Yadarola for a seat on Argentina’s Federal Court of Appeals despite Cristina Kirchner’s earlier public attacks on him as a “lawfare” judge.
  • The vote has fueled speculation about an agreement with the government, although Peronist senators deny a pact and describe their approach as more pragmatic.
  • The court’s vacant seat on the panel that will judge the Hotesur-Los Sauces case involving Cristina Kirchner and Máximo Kirchner remains a central concern in the political debate.

Kirchnerism voted to elevate Pablo Yadarola to Argentina’s Federal Court of Appeals after Cristina Kirchner had denounced him as a “lawfare” judge, called him “a piece of garbage” and accused him of helping conceal evidence linked to a trip to Lago Escondido. The reversal has produced loud internal questions and an obvious suspicion: was there a pact?

lawfare

· Cristina KirchnerHer earlier description of Yadarola as a judge involved in politically motivated legal action.

Members of the Peronist bloc in the Senate reject that explanation, although they acknowledge that the movement has entered a more pragmatic phase. They also concede that one court carries particular importance: the tribunal that will hear the Hotesur-Los Sauces case involving Cristina Kirchner and her son Máximo. One of its seats is vacant.

Asked what Kirchnerism could gain by supporting Yadarola, one bloc member gave a blunt answer: “Remove Bruglia.” Yadarola will replace Leopoldo Bruglia, one of two judges appointed under Mauricio Macri through transfers. The other, Pablo Bertuzzi, was recently reappointed by Javier Milei but failed to win the Peronist senators’ support.

a piece of garbage

· Cristina KirchnerHer earlier insult directed at Yadarola over the Lago Escondido controversy.

That explanation is not entirely convincing. Yadarola would have secured Senate approval anyway because the government already had the votes. Unlike Bruglia, who served temporarily, Yadarola received approval from the full Senate for a permanent appointment, at least until he reaches 75. The vote therefore also looked like a demonstration of unity. “We needed to show that we had 25 votes,” a Cristina-aligned figure told La Nación.

Remove Bruglia

· Unnamed member of the Peronist Senate blocThe explanation given for supporting Yadarola’s appointment.

Justice Minister Juan Bautista Mahiques could read the result as an important signal. He wants to become attorney general and would need a two-thirds majority, which he would not have if all 25 Peronists opposed him. The bloc’s explanation is narrower: “Yadarola did not sign any ruling against us, unlike Bertuzzi.” Yadarola, appointed by Cristina Kirchner in 2015, has served as an economic crimes judge, a post that did not normally involve investigations of senior government officials.

We needed to show that we had 25 votes

· Unnamed Cristina-aligned political figureThe comment portrayed the vote as a display of Peronist unity.
About this summary

Originally published by La Nación in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.

More Stories

From Our Blog