Actor Charles Okocha denies biting Portable in boxing rematch
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Actor Charles Okocha denied singer Portable's claim that he bit him during a celebrity boxing rematch.
- Okocha stated he wore a mouth guard, making biting impossible, and suggested Portable accept his loss.
- This follows their second boxing match, which Okocha won by disqualification after Portable abandoned boxing techniques.
Nollywood actor Charles Okocha has refuted claims made by singer Portable that he bit him during their recent celebrity boxing rematch. Portable had alleged that Okocha bit his back and locked his neck during the contest.
Portable has been going around telling people I bit him on the back. I was wearing a mouth guard; how is that even possible? He was just lying.
During an appearance on TVC Entertainment, Okocha dismissed the accusation, explaining that he wore a mouth guard throughout the fight, rendering biting impossible. "Portable has been going around telling people I bit him on the back. I was wearing a mouth guard; how is that even possible? He was just lying," Okocha stated. He added that he had no reason to resort to biting, humorously remarking, "I would rather chew grass than bite him. I donโt want to catch rabies."
I would rather chew grass than bite him. I donโt want to catch rabies.
Okocha urged Portable to accept his defeat, noting the singer's appearance and stating, "Have you seen how Portableโs skin looks? Hell no, I wouldnโt do that." The recent bout saw Okocha emerge victorious after Portable was disqualified for using wrestling techniques and subsequently leaving the ring. This was their second boxing encounter, with Portable having defeated Okocha in their first match in 2023.
Have you seen how Portableโs skin looks? Hell no, I wouldnโt do that. He should just accept defeat.
Originally published by The Punch in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.