DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria /Economy & Trade

African airlines reject API, PNR charges

From The Punch · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • African airlines are opposing government attempts to charge them and passengers for Advance Passenger Information (API) and Passenger Name Record (PNR) systems.
  • Industry bodies argue that border security is a state responsibility and should be government-funded.
  • They warn that passing costs to airlines and travelers could increase air travel expenses, reduce connectivity, and harm economic benefits.

African airlines and their industry representatives are pushing back against government efforts to impose charges for Advance Passenger Information (API) and Passenger Name Record (PNR) systems. These systems allow governments to collect passenger data before travel, aiding border control and security. However, the African Airlines Association (AFRAA), Airlines Association of Southern Africa (AASA), and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) argue that funding these security measures is the responsibility of national governments, not the aviation industry or travelers.

In a joint statement, the associations expressed their support for the deployment of API and PNR systems across the continent, recognizing their role in strengthening border controls and enhancing the efficiency of legitimate travel. However, they strongly rejected the idea of passing the associated costs onto airlines and passengers. They contend that such charges would undermine the benefits of these systems and place an undue financial burden on an industry already facing high operating costs.

governments should fund the systems as part of their border-security responsibilities.

โ€” AFRAA Secretary-General, Abdรฉrahmane Berthรฉ; AASA Chief Executive Officer, Aaron Munetsi; and IATA Regional Vice President, Africa and Middle East, Kamil AlawadhiStating the industry bodies' position on who should bear the cost of API and PNR systems.

The industry bodies cited the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) policies, which classify border security as a government responsibility. Consequently, they argue, the costs for API and PNR programs should be borne by governments as part of their core security functions. Imposing these fees on airlines and passengers, they warned, would inevitably lead to more expensive air travel, diminish connectivity across Africa, and potentially jeopardize the wider economic advantages that aviation brings through tourism, trade, and investment.

The associations urged governments to establish clear legal and operational frameworks before implementing API and PNR systems, ensuring compliance with ICAO standards and international best practices. They emphasized four key principles that should guide these systems: legality, proportionality, purpose limitation, and consistency and accuracy. The core message is that while security is paramount, the financial burden should not stifle the growth and accessibility of air travel in Africa.

The International Civil Aviation Organization Policies on Charges for Airports and Air Navigation Services, contained in Doc 9082, recognise border security as a government responsibility.

โ€” AFRAA, AASA, and IATACiting international aviation policy to support their argument for government funding.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Punch. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.