DistantNews
Support us
After Ceuta Crisis, Spain Urges Italy to Withdraw Border Checks
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania /Crime & Justice

After Ceuta Crisis, Spain Urges Italy to Withdraw Border Checks

From Delfi · () Lithuanian

Translated from Lithuanian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • Spain's Interior Minister Fernando Grande Marlaska urged Italy to immediately revoke its border checks, deeming them unnecessary and disproportionate.
  • Marlaska argued that entry into Ceuta does not automatically grant access to the Schengen area, and no threat to the Schengen zone originated from Ceuta.
  • Italy's Interior Minister stated the temporary border control renewal was a preventive measure for national security, not aimed at Spain, while the European Commission will assess its proportionality.

Spanish Interior Minister Fernando Grande Marlaska has called on Italy to immediately lift its border checks, which he described as pointless and disproportionate. The Spanish minister argued that entering the Spanish enclave of Ceuta does not grant automatic rights to enter the Schengen area, and crucially, that no threat to the Schengen zone had materialized from Ceuta.

I ask that these additional control measures be immediately lifted, as they clearly do not correspond to what was recognized (during the EU ministers' video conference), namely that the Schengen area was not at risk.

โ€” Fernando Grande MarlaskaAfter a video conference with EU interior ministers, urging Italy to revoke border checks.

"I ask that these additional control measures be immediately lifted, as they clearly do not correspond to what was recognized (during the EU ministers' video conference), namely that the Schengen area was not at risk," Marlaska stated after a video conference with EU interior ministers. He expressed confusion over Italy's decision, calling it "completely unnecessary and disproportionate."

Marlaska emphasized that there was no secondary movement risk because Ceuta has a special status, and Frontex, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, reported no danger to the Schengen area. He contrasted this with the secondary movement of people arriving in Spain from the East, noting that internal checks are not imposed in such cases.

I did not understand why Italy closed the Schengen area; it seemed completely unnecessary and disproportionate to me.

โ€” Fernando Grande MarlaskaExpressing his view on Italy's decision to implement border controls.

In response, Italy's Interior Minister asserted that the temporary renewal of internal air and sea border controls for arrivals from Spain was not directed against Spain or any other partner. He characterized it as a "preventive and organizational decision" aimed at ensuring national security and the integrity of the European control system during a high-tension period. The minister also expressed "sincere solidarity" with the Spanish government.

There was no risk of secondary movement because Ceuta has a special status, and Frontex itself reported that there was no risk to the Schengen area.

โ€” Fernando Grande MarlaskaExplaining why he believes the border checks are unnecessary.

Magnus Brunner, the European Commissioner responsible for internal affairs, announced that the European Commission would evaluate whether Italy's decision to suspend the Schengen agreement with Spain was a proportionate measure. He also commented on Spain's recent amnesty for over 600,000 irregular migrants, calling it a "bad signal," a sentiment echoed by Italy's Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani.

It is a preventive and organizational decision aimed at ensuring national security and the integrity of the European control system during a high-tension period, as has already happened in many other cases.

โ€” Italian Interior MinisterDescribing Italy's rationale for renewing temporary border controls.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Delfi in Lithuanian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.